Morality and Amorality in Ba(udri)llard's Crash: A Poetic Perspective.

This article revisits a well-known discussion about morality in J.G. Ballard's Crash that surrounded the appearance of Jean Baudrillard's essay of the same name in a special section of SFS (Nov. 1991). In this debate, N. Katherine Hayles and Vivian Sobchack strongly oppose Baudrillard's claim that t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Science Fiction Studies Vol. 47; no. 1; pp. 47 - 73
Autor principal: Tomberg, Jaak
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of California Press Mar2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=141887823&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 141887823
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00917729
        SFS
      jtl: Science Fiction Studies
      issn: 00917729
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2020
      vid: 47
      iid: 1
      pid: 414
      pub: University of California Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        141887823
        10.5621/sciefictstud.47.1.0047
      ppf: 47
      ppct: 26
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.4MB
      tig:
        atl: Morality and Amorality in Ba(udri)llard's Crash: A Poetic Perspective.
      aug:
        au: Tomberg, Jaak
      su:
        Ethics
        Ballard, J. G., 1930-2009
        Crash (Poem)
        Baudrillard, Jean, 1929-2007
        Transformative learning
      sug:
        subj:
          Ethics
          Ballard, J. G., 1930-2009
          Crash (Poem)
          Baudrillard, Jean, 1929-2007
          Transformative learning
      ab: This article revisits a well-known discussion about morality in J.G. Ballard's Crash that surrounded the appearance of Jean Baudrillard's essay of the same name in a special section of SFS (Nov. 1991). In this debate, N. Katherine Hayles and Vivian Sobchack strongly oppose Baudrillard's claim that there "is no affectivity behind [the world that Crash depicts]: no psychology, no ambivalence or desire, no libido or death drive" (314) to Ballard's novel, and, accordingly, no moral point or warning either. In contrast, Hayles and Sobchack argue that the novel warns us about the transformative influence of contemporary technology. I undertake a thorough analysis of Crash's main poetic features: the prevalence of showing over telling, the recurrence of accounts over descriptions, the thoroughly technical vocabulary, allusions to transcendence, and the interpretive anxiety created by a first-person narrator that bears the author's name. I map the contrast between Ballard's disinterested style of writing and the apparent affective charge of his characters while showing how this contrast generates a deep ambivalence that enables both moral and morally indifferent interpretations of the novel. The reader is never told what to think about the obscene events that occur and this provokes her to make difficult moral decisions about the novel.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Science Fiction Studies is the property of University of California Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Science Fiction Studies
      holder: University of California Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N