Abstract and Concrete.

Philosophical usage of "abstract" to mean "not located in space and time" is (1) an overextension of the ordinary meaning which encourages conflating platonic realism about universals with conceptualism about universals, since (2) "abstract" in its ordinary use is quite appropriate to the traditiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Humanities Bulletin Vol. 2; no. 1; pp. 50 - 61
Autor principal: Cargile, James
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: London Academic Publishing Ltd. May2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=141958681&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 141958681
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        25174266
        M95E
      jtl: Humanities Bulletin
      issn: 25174266
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2019
      vid: 2
      iid: 1
      pid: 52547
      pub: London Academic Publishing Ltd.
    artinfo:
      ui: 141958681
      ppf: 50
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Abstract and Concrete.
      aug:
        au: Cargile, James
        affil: Corcoran Department of Philosophy, University of Virginia, 113 Cocke Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
      su:
        Universals (Philosophy)
        Nominalism
        Conceptualism
        Spacetime
        Realism
      sug:
        subj:
          Universals (Philosophy)
          Nominalism
          Conceptualism
          Spacetime
          Realism
      keyword:
        abstract
        conceptualism
        concrete
        nominalism
        realism
        universals
      ab: Philosophical usage of "abstract" to mean "not located in space and time" is (1) an overextension of the ordinary meaning which encourages conflating platonic realism about universals with conceptualism about universals, since (2) "abstract" in its ordinary use is quite appropriate to the traditional conceptualist theory of universals, in which the "abstract general idea" is a standard item. Applied with its ordinary meaning to the platonic theory, "abstract" is incorrect. As appropriated in philosophical discussion, "abstract" does apply truly. That is not a good reason to persist in the misleading use.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N