Pluractionality: A cross‐linguistic perspective.
This paper aims to give a cross‐linguistic overview of pluractionality. Pluractionality is defined as a structural modification of the verb indicating the presence of multiple events. The paper first investigates the functions associated with pluractional markers in the languages of the world and cl...
| Publicado en: | Language & Linguistics Compass Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 1 - 36 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Mar2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=141997622&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 141997622 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 1749818X BDC7 jtl: Language & Linguistics Compass issn: 1749818X maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Mar2020 vid: 14 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 141997622 10.1111/lnc3.12366 ppf: 1 ppct: 35 formats: tig: atl: Pluractionality: A cross‐linguistic perspective. aug: au: Mattiola, Simone affil: University of Bologna su: Grammatical categories Sequential pattern mining Verbs sug: subj: Grammatical categories Sequential pattern mining Verbs ab: This paper aims to give a cross‐linguistic overview of pluractionality. Pluractionality is defined as a structural modification of the verb indicating the presence of multiple events. The paper first investigates the functions associated with pluractional markers in the languages of the world and classifies them into core and additional functions. I then present the most frequent marking strategies that the languages adopt in order to encode pluractionality and briefly discuss the morphological nature of one in particular (i.e., lexical alternation), as well as the formal identification of participant plurality. Finally, I examine the grammatical status of pluractionality in a cross‐linguistic perspective, taking the most recent typological literature into consideration. I conclude that "pluractionality" cannot be theoretically conceived as a unique, cross‐linguistically valid category but should rather be regarded as a label, which indicates different phenomena in different languages, useful for typological comparison but not reflecting any kind of pre‐established grammatical category. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|