Improving early warning scores - more data, better validation, the same response: a reply.
Improving early warning scores - more data, better validation, the same response: a reply We thank Mackay et al. [1] for their comments on our editorial [2], which accompanied the article by Chiu et al. [3] and agree with the definition of external validation that they provide. Randomly selected pat...
| Publicado en: | Anaesthesia Vol. 75; no. 4; pp. 551 - 552 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | commentary Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Apr2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | Improving early warning scores - more data, better validation, the same response: a reply We thank Mackay et al. [1] for their comments on our editorial [2], which accompanied the article by Chiu et al. [3] and agree with the definition of external validation that they provide. Randomly selected patients whose data are not included in the training data used to develop the prediction model and used for validation are similar to, and subject to, the same sampling processes as patients in the development dataset. |
|---|