Programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with active vs previous arrhythmic myocarditis.

Introduction: No studies so far addressed the role of invasive programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in myocarditis patient's arrhythmic risk stratification. Methods and Results: We present a single‐center prospective study on 96 consecutive adult patients (44 ± 13 years, 70.1% males) with myocar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 31; no. 3; pp. 692 - 702
Autores principales: Peretto, Giovanni, Sala, Simone, Basso, Cristina, Della Bella, Paolo
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=142181998&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 142181998
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10453873
        GSB
      jtl: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
      issn: 10453873
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2020
      vid: 31
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        142181998
        142181998
        145782561
        142181998
        10.1111/jce.14374
        142181998
      ppf: 692
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with active vs previous arrhythmic myocarditis.
      aug:
        au:
          Peretto, Giovanni
          Sala, Simone
          Basso, Cristina
          Della Bella, Paolo
        affil: Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita‐Salute University, Milan, Italy
      sug:
        subj:
          Myocardial Diseases
          Arrhythmia, Ventricular
          Electrophysiology
          Heart Ventricle
          Human
          Prospective Studies
          Middle Age
          Male
          Female
          Confidence Intervals
          Descriptive Statistics
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Introduction: No studies so far addressed the role of invasive programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in myocarditis patient's arrhythmic risk stratification. Methods and Results: We present a single‐center prospective study on 96 consecutive adult patients (44 ± 13 years, 70.1% males) with myocarditis and ventricular arrhythmias (VA) at index hospitalization. Depending on baseline endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and cardiac magnetic resonance, patients were divided into two groups: active (A) vs nonactive (NA) myocarditis. All of the patients underwent PVS at index hospitalization. Medical treatment and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) implantation were clinically‐driven. Malignant VA episodes (MVA = ventricular tachycardias [VT], ventricular fibrillation [VF], appropriate ICD therapy) were evaluated at 54 ± 18 months follow‐up (FU). Patients who underwent VT ablation or with myocarditis recurrence (n = 9) were excluded. Of 87 patients, 41 (47.2%) were in group A. PVS was positive in 32 cases (36.8%), 16 A vs 16 NA (P = NS), with no associations with VA type at presentation. Before discharge, 55 patients (63.2%) underwent ICD implant. In FU, MVA occurred in 27 patients (31.0%), 13 A vs 14 NA (P = NS), 18 PVS+ vs 9 PVS‐ (P <.001). The association between PVS result and FU MVA was maximal in group NA (high rule‐out performance with negative predictive value = 90.0%, P <.001) and minimal in group A (low rule‐in performance with PPV = 43.8%, P =.302). In the whole population, three independent factors for major VA were identified: major arrhythmic onset by sustained VT or VF (HR 2.8, 95% CI, 1.0‐7.4, P =.042), presence of fibrosis at EMB (HR 5.8, 95% CI, 1.1‐30.0, P =.038), and PVS positivity (HR 4.2, 95% CI, 1.7‐10.7, P =.003). Conclusion: In myocarditis patients presenting with VA, PVS is associated with FU MVA in NA patients, but not in A ones. Overall, risk stratification of arrhythmic myocardits is still complex and multifactorial.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N