Was Bonaventure a four-dimensionalist?
Richard Cross has argued that Bonaventure adhered to the view about the diachronic identity of substances that nowadays goes under the name 'four-dimensionalism', and according to which substances persist through time by having different temporal parts at different times. The aim of this paper is to...
| Publicado en: | British Journal for the History of Philosophy Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 393 - 405 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Mar2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=142246679&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 142246679 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09608788 5AX jtl: British Journal for the History of Philosophy issn: 09608788 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2020 vid: 28 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 142246679 10.1080/09608788.2019.1641468 ppf: 393 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 853KB tig: atl: Was Bonaventure a four-dimensionalist? aug: au: Costa, Damiano affil: University of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland su: Perdurantism & endurantism (Philosophy) Permanence in literature Bonaventure, Saint, Cardinal, ca. 1217-1274 Logical prediction Metaphysics sug: subj: Perdurantism & endurantism (Philosophy) Permanence in literature Bonaventure, Saint, Cardinal, ca. 1217-1274 Logical prediction Metaphysics keyword: Bonaventure four-dimensionalism permanence and succession persistence totum simul ab: Richard Cross has argued that Bonaventure adhered to the view about the diachronic identity of substances that nowadays goes under the name 'four-dimensionalism', and according to which substances persist through time by having different temporal parts at different times. The aim of this paper is to argue that this interpretation is wrong, and that Bonaventure was no four-dimensionalist. Along the way, the paper discusses the conjecture that there is a correspondence between contemporary analytic and high scholastic theories of diachronic identity and presents several lines of research that spring from this conjecture. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of British Journal for the History of Philosophy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: British Journal for the History of Philosophy holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|