Really Expressive Presuppositions and How to Block Them.

Kaplan (1999) argued that a different dimension of expressive meaning ("use-conditional", as opposed to truth-conditional) is required to characterize the meaning of pejoratives, including slurs and racial epithets. Elaborating on this, writers have argued that the expressive meaning of pejoratives...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Grazer Philosophische Studien Vol. 97; no. 1; pp. 138 - 159
Autores principales: Marques, Teresa, García-Carpintero, Manuel
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Kaplan (1999) argued that a different dimension of expressive meaning ("use-conditional", as opposed to truth-conditional) is required to characterize the meaning of pejoratives, including slurs and racial epithets. Elaborating on this, writers have argued that the expressive meaning of pejoratives and slurs is either a conventional implicature (Potts 2007) or a presupposition (Macià 2002 and 2014 , Schlenker 2007 , Cepollaro and Stojanovic 2016). Here the authors argue that an expressive presuppositional theory accounts well for the data, but that expressive presuppositions are not just propositions to be added to a common ground. They hold that expressives, including pejoratives and slurs, make requirements on a contextual record governed by sui generis norms specific to affective attitudes and their expressions.