Slurs and Toxicity: It's Not about Meaning.

Slurs are special. They can be so powerful and harmful that even mentioning them can be offensive. What explains this "toxicity" that many slurs display? Most discussions in the literature on slurs attempt to analyze the derogatory meaning of slurs, differing in where they locate this meaning – in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Grazer Philosophische Studien Vol. 97; no. 1; pp. 177 - 203
Autor principal: Rappaport, Jesse
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=142274739&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 142274739
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01659227
        NFG
      jtl: Grazer Philosophische Studien
      issn: 01659227
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2020
      vid: 97
      iid: 1
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        142274739
        10.1163/18756735-09701010
      ppf: 177
      ppct: 26
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 225KB
      tig:
        atl: Slurs and Toxicity: It's Not about Meaning.
      aug:
        au: Rappaport, Jesse
        affil: City University of New York
      su:
        Discriminatory language
        Neurolinguistics
        Case studies
        Pragmatics
      sug:
        subj:
          Discriminatory language
          Neurolinguistics
          Case studies
          Pragmatics
      keyword:
        evaluatives
        hate speech
        pejoratives
        semantics
        slurs
      ab: Slurs are special. They can be so powerful and harmful that even mentioning them can be offensive. What explains this "toxicity" that many slurs display? Most discussions in the literature on slurs attempt to analyze the derogatory meaning of slurs, differing in where they locate this meaning – in the semantics, pragmatics, etc. In this article, the author argues that these content theories, despite their merits, are unable to account for toxicity. For a content-based approach to toxicity implies that two meaning-equivalent phrases should have the same toxicity. The author argues that this is not the case for the analyses proffered by current content theorists. Instead, he argues that we can only explain toxicity by understanding the special neurolinguistic properties of slurs. The author then draws out the consequences of this view for the issue of non-derogatory uses of slurs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Grazer Philosophische Studien is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Grazer Philosophische Studien
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N