Fundamental and Emergent Geometry in Newtonian Physics.

Using as a starting point recent and apparently incompatible conclusions by Saunders ([ 2013 ]) and Knox ([ 2014 ]), I revisit the question of the correct spacetime setting for Newtonian physics. I argue that understood correctly, these two versions of Newtonian physics make the same claims both abo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Vol. 71; no. 1; pp. 1 - 33
Autor principal: Wallace, David
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Chicago Press Mar2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=142279587&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 142279587
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00070882
        BPL
      jtl: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00070882
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2020
      vid: 71
      iid: 1
      pid: 415
      pub: University of Chicago Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        142279587
        10.1093/bjps/axx056
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 32
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Fundamental and Emergent Geometry in Newtonian Physics.
      aug:
        au: Wallace, David
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
      su:
        Mechanics (Physics)
        Physics
        Spacetime
        Social groups
        Structural analysis (Engineering)
        Newton's law of gravitation
      sug:
        subj:
          Mechanics (Physics)
          Physics
          Spacetime
          Social groups
          Structural analysis (Engineering)
          Newton's law of gravitation
      ab: Using as a starting point recent and apparently incompatible conclusions by Saunders ([ 2013 ]) and Knox ([ 2014 ]), I revisit the question of the correct spacetime setting for Newtonian physics. I argue that understood correctly, these two versions of Newtonian physics make the same claims both about the background geometry required to define the theory, and about the inertial structure of the theory. In doing so I illustrate and explore in detail the view—espoused by Knox, and also by Brown ([ 2005 ])—that inertial structure is defined by the dynamics governing subsystems of a larger system. This clarifies some interesting features of Newtonian physics, notably (i) the distinction between using the theory to model subsystems of a larger whole and using it to model complete universes, and (ii) the scale-relativity of spacetime structure. 1   Introduction 2   Newtonian Mechanics and Galilean Spacetime 3   Vector Relationism and Maxwellian Spacetime 4   Recovering the Galilei Group: Dynamics of Subsystems 5   Knox on Inertial Structure 6   Connections on Maxwellian Spacetime 7   Knox on Newtonian Gravity 8   Vector Relationism and Newton–Cartan Theory 9   Inertial Structure in Newton–Cartan Gravity 10   Reconciling Knox and Saunders 11   Conclusions
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N