Assessing Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity With Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures Using Digital Technology.

Objective: Health information technology has enabled efficient measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is becoming more widely adopted for research and routine care, and some PROMIS instrumen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Arthritis Care & Research Vol. 72; no. 4; pp. 553 - 561
Autores principales: Yun, Huifeng, Nowell, W. Benjamin, Curtis, David, H. Willig, James, Yang, Shuo, Auriemma, Matthew, Chen, Lang, Filby, Cooper, Curtis, Jeffrey R.
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Apr2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=142439409&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 142439409
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        2151464X
        B8M4
      jtl: Arthritis Care & Research
      issn: 2151464X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2020
      vid: 72
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        142439409
        142439409
        145863616
        NLM30927515
        142439409
        10.1002/acr.23888
        NLM30927515
        142439409
      ppf: 553
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Assessing Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity With Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures Using Digital Technology.
      aug:
        au:
          Yun, Huifeng
          Nowell, W. Benjamin
          Curtis, David
          H. Willig, James
          Yang, Shuo
          Auriemma, Matthew
          Chen, Lang
          Filby, Cooper
          Curtis, Jeffrey R.
        affil: University of Alabama at Birmingham
      sug:
        subj:
          Fatigue Diagnosis
          Arthritis, Rheumatoid Diagnosis
          Severity of Illness Indices
          Human
          Arthritis, Rheumatoid Physiopathology
          Pain Measurement
          Middle Age
          Adult
          Fatigue Physiopathology
          Male
          Female
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Questionnaires
          Funding Source
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Objective: Health information technology has enabled efficient measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is becoming more widely adopted for research and routine care, and some PROMIS instruments might be substituted for lengthier, legacy PRO instruments.Methods: Four PROMIS computer-adaptive testing (CAT) instruments (pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and fatigue) and the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), along with pain intensity and patient global assessment score, were administered to participants in the ArthritisPower registry. The RAPID3 was predicted using different combinations of these variables to create a new score (CAT-PROMIS RAPID3). Kappa statistics and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were used to measure agreement between the observed versus predicted RAPID3.Results: A total of 6,154 eligible patients contributed 11,275 observations. The mean ± SD age was 52.7 ± 10.5 years, and 93% of patients were women. The median assessment times ranged from 29 seconds (PROMIS sleep disturbance) to 116 seconds (RAPID3). As single pairwise comparisons, the PROMIS CATs examined were modestly correlated (r approximately 0.4-0.7) to one other and RAPID3. Together with the pain intensity and patient global assessment, the PROMIS instruments explained a high fraction of total variance (R2 = 0.97) of the RAPID3 score. In the model with the highest agreement (κ = 0.93) between the observed RAPID3 and the CAT-PROMIS predicted RAPID3, Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement showed minimal residual differences and no systematic biases.Conclusion: There was excellent agreement between the observed RAPID3 and predicted RAPID3 scores estimated using several PROMIS instruments. The Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire and patient global assessment components of RAPID3 may be unnecessary if PROMIS scores are available.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N