Impact of a Specialized Ambulatory Clinic on Refractory Breathlessness in Subjects With Advanced COPD.

BACKGROUND: Severe exertional dyspnea is a commonly reported symptom in patients with COPD, especially in the advanced stages. Our objective was to assess the preliminary impact of comprehensive, individualized management provided by a specialized tertiary center clinic on exertional dyspnea and pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 65; no. 4; pp. 444 - 455
Autores principales: Elbehairy, Amany F., McIsaac, Hannah, Hill, Elizabeth, Norman, Patrick A., Day, Andrew G., Neder, J. Alberto, O'Donnell, Denis E., Harle, Ingrid A.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Apr2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Severe exertional dyspnea is a commonly reported symptom in patients with COPD, especially in the advanced stages. Our objective was to assess the preliminary impact of comprehensive, individualized management provided by a specialized tertiary center clinic on exertional dyspnea and patient-centered outcomes in patients with advanced COPD. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 45 subjects with COPD who were evaluated in a newly established dyspnea clinic over 3 years. Those with severe exertional dyspnea (Medical Research Council dyspnea score of >4/5), despite optimal disease-targeted therapy were eligible for referral. We used the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) to assess symptoms. Responders were defined as those whose change from baseline to 2-months met the minimum clinically important difference of <=1 in ESAS-r score for shortness of breath. RESULTS: Subjects (mean = SD age 70 = 7 years) had an average FEV1 of 36 = 18% predicted and a Medical Research Council dyspnea score of 4.7 = 0.4. Responses to the intervention were variable and mean change in the ESAS-r score for shortness of breath in the total group was =0.32 = 3.39, P = .53. Forty-seven percent of the subjects were identified as responders, and 42, 40, 40, and 33% met the minimum clinically important difference for improvement in ESAS-r scores for tiredness, anxiety, well-being, and depression, respectively. Responders had fewer emergency department annual visits in the 2 years after their first clinic visit compared with nonresponders (mean = SD, 1.38 = 1.63 vs 4.45 = 5.52, P = .034). CONCLUSIONS: Although the impact of our specialized advanced dyspnea clinic was variable, as evaluated by the ESAS-r, it provided measurable additional clinically important benefit to almost half of the subjects with advanced COPD and severe refractory dyspnea.