Improving the translation of search strategies using the Polyglot Search Translator: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Searching for studies to include in a systematic review (SR) is a time- and labor-intensive process with searches of multiple databases recommended. To reduce the time spent translating search strings across databases, a tool called the Polyglot Search Translator (PST) was developed. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of the Medical Library Association Vol. 108; no. 2; pp. 195 - 208
Autores principales: Clark, Justin Michael, Sanders, Sharon, Carter, Matthew, Honeyman, David, Cleo, Gina, Auld, Yvonne, Booth, Debbie, Condron, Patrick, Dalais, Christine, Bateup, Sarah, Linthwaite, Bronwyn, May, Nikki, Munn, Jo, Ramsay, Lindy, Rickett, Kirsty, Rutter, Cameron, Smith, Angela, Sondergeld, Peter, Wallin, Margie, Jones, Mark
Formato: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: University of Pittsburgh, University Library System Apr2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=142511242&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 142511242
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15365050
        PI8
      jtl: Journal of the Medical Library Association
      issn: 15365050
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2020
      vid: 108
      iid: 2
      pid: 60406
      pub: University of Pittsburgh, University Library System
      place: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        142511242
        142511242
        142511242
        10.5195/jmla.2020.834
        142511242
      ppf: 195
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Improving the translation of search strategies using the Polyglot Search Translator: a randomized controlled trial.
      aug:
        au:
          Clark, Justin Michael
          Sanders, Sharon
          Carter, Matthew
          Honeyman, David
          Cleo, Gina
          Auld, Yvonne
          Booth, Debbie
          Condron, Patrick
          Dalais, Christine
          Bateup, Sarah
          Linthwaite, Bronwyn
          May, Nikki
          Munn, Jo
          Ramsay, Lindy
          Rickett, Kirsty
          Rutter, Cameron
          Smith, Angela
          Sondergeld, Peter
          Wallin, Margie
          Jones, Mark
        affil: Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Computerized Literature Searching Methods
          Translations Methods
          Quality Improvement Methods
          Human
          Funding Source
          Time Factors
          Bibliography and References
          Randomized Controlled Trials
      ab: Background: Searching for studies to include in a systematic review (SR) is a time- and labor-intensive process with searches of multiple databases recommended. To reduce the time spent translating search strings across databases, a tool called the Polyglot Search Translator (PST) was developed. The authors evaluated whether using the PST as a search translation aid reduces the time required to translate search strings without increasing errors. Methods: In a randomized trial, twenty participants were randomly allocated ten database search strings and then randomly assigned to translate five with the assistance of the PST (PST-A method) and five without the assistance of the PST (manual method). We compared the time taken to translate search strings, the number of errors made, and how close the number of references retrieved by a translated search was to the number retrieved by a reference standard translation. Results: Sixteen participants performed 174 translations using the PST-A method and 192 translations using the manual method. The mean time taken to translate a search string with the PST-A method was 31 minutes versus 45 minutes by the manual method (mean difference: 14 minutes). The mean number of errors made per translation by the PST-A method was 8.6 versus 14.6 by the manual method. Large variation in the number of references retrieved makes results for this outcome inconclusive, although the number of references retrieved by the PST-A method was closer to the reference standard translation than the manual method. Conclusion: When used to assist with translating search strings across databases, the PST can increase the speed of translation without increasing errors. Errors in search translations can still be a problem, and search specialists should be aware of this.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N