Insecure Resources, Bilateral Trade, and Endogenous Predation: A Game‐Theoretic Analysis of Conflict and Trade.
This article analyzes how interstate conflict over resources affects the incentives to trade and how greater trade openness affects the endogenous decisions of arming by enemy countries. We identify conditions under which there is trade between two adversary countries and show that each adversary's...
| Published in: | Southern Economic Journal Vol. 86; no. 4; pp. 1338 - 1372 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Apr2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=142633386&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 142633386 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00384038 SEJ jtl: Southern Economic Journal issn: 00384038 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2020 vid: 86 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 142633386 10.1002/soej.12430 ppf: 1338 ppct: 34 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P size: 703KB tig: atl: Insecure Resources, Bilateral Trade, and Endogenous Predation: A Game‐Theoretic Analysis of Conflict and Trade. aug: au: Chang, Yang‐Ming Wu, Shih‐Jye affil: Department of Economics, Kansas State University, 319 Waters Hall, Manhattan KS 66506‐4001,, USA Department of Political Economy, National Sun Yat‐Sen University, Kaohsiung 80424,, Taiwan su: Commerce Predation Exports sug: subj: Commerce Predation Exports ab: This article analyzes how interstate conflict over resources affects the incentives to trade and how greater trade openness affects the endogenous decisions of arming by enemy countries. We identify conditions under which there is trade between two adversary countries and show that each adversary's arming affects domestic welfare in three different ways. The first is an export‐revenue effect, which increases welfare because arming causes export revenue to go up (i.e., there is an arming‐induced terms‐of‐trade improvement). The second is a resource‐predation effect, which increases welfare because arming increases the appropriation of a rival country's resource input to produce a consumption good. The third is an output‐distortion effect, which reduces welfare because arming lowers the domestic production of civilian goods. Based on these effects, we show circumstances in which greater trade openness reduces the intensity of arming. We also discuss the implications of resource security asymmetry for conflict and trade. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|