Governmental Communication of Climate Change Risk and Efficacy: Moving Audiences Toward "Danger Control".

Public communication represents a vital civic function for governments developing climate policies, particularly with vulnerable communities under environmental justice mandates. In this study, three videos developed to support a state's climate change public engagement are used to evaluate how gove...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Management Vol. 65; no. 5; pp. 678 - 689
Main Authors: Akerlof, Karen L., Boules, Caroline, Ban Rohring, Elizabeth, Rohring, Bill, Kappalman, Samantha
Format: Journal Article
Published: Springer Nature May2020
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=142648835&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 142648835
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0364152X
        O5H
      jtl: Environmental Management
      issn: 0364152X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2020
      vid: 65
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        142648835
        10.1007/s00267-020-01283-8
        142648835
      ppf: 678
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Governmental Communication of Climate Change Risk and Efficacy: Moving Audiences Toward "Danger Control".
      aug:
        au:
          Akerlof, Karen L.
          Boules, Caroline
          Ban Rohring, Elizabeth
          Rohring, Bill
          Kappalman, Samantha
        affil: Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University, 4400 University Dr., MS 6A8, 22030, Fairfax, VA, USA
      sug:
      ab: Public communication represents a vital civic function for governments developing climate policies, particularly with vulnerable communities under environmental justice mandates. In this study, three videos developed to support a state's climate change public engagement are used to evaluate how governmental communication using the frames of health, science, and local effects influences two theoretically important constructs, risk perception and collective efficacy. Vulnerable audiences differentiated by stress, perceived lack of control, and poor health demonstrate significant gains in collective efficacy relative to risk—"danger control" —after the intervention. But we find no differences between the three frames in their effects on perceptions of climate change risk and collective efficacy.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N