Governmental Communication of Climate Change Risk and Efficacy: Moving Audiences Toward "Danger Control".
Public communication represents a vital civic function for governments developing climate policies, particularly with vulnerable communities under environmental justice mandates. In this study, three videos developed to support a state's climate change public engagement are used to evaluate how gove...
| Published in: | Environmental Management Vol. 65; no. 5; pp. 678 - 689 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
May2020
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=142648835&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 142648835 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 0364152X O5H jtl: Environmental Management issn: 0364152X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May2020 vid: 65 iid: 5 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 142648835 10.1007/s00267-020-01283-8 142648835 ppf: 678 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Governmental Communication of Climate Change Risk and Efficacy: Moving Audiences Toward "Danger Control". aug: au: Akerlof, Karen L. Boules, Caroline Ban Rohring, Elizabeth Rohring, Bill Kappalman, Samantha affil: Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University, 4400 University Dr., MS 6A8, 22030, Fairfax, VA, USA sug: ab: Public communication represents a vital civic function for governments developing climate policies, particularly with vulnerable communities under environmental justice mandates. In this study, three videos developed to support a state's climate change public engagement are used to evaluate how governmental communication using the frames of health, science, and local effects influences two theoretically important constructs, risk perception and collective efficacy. Vulnerable audiences differentiated by stress, perceived lack of control, and poor health demonstrate significant gains in collective efficacy relative to risk—"danger control" —after the intervention. But we find no differences between the three frames in their effects on perceptions of climate change risk and collective efficacy. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|