In Pursuit of Genuine Chinese Equivalents: The Case of a Nineteenth-Century Dutch-Chinese Dictionary.

Despite the consensus among scholars that it is impossible for equivalence to have the same meaning in linguistics as it does in mathematics – it is impossible to have equivalents in translation – there is still merit in investigating bilingual dictionaries as they can help us understand the differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Lexicography Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 104 - 116
Autor principal: Heijns, Audrey
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Mar2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=142705656&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 142705656
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09503846
        N5M
      jtl: International Journal of Lexicography
      issn: 09503846
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2020
      vid: 33
      iid: 1
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        142705656
        10.1093/ijl/ecz018
      ppf: 104
      ppct: 12
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: In Pursuit of Genuine Chinese Equivalents: The Case of a Nineteenth-Century Dutch-Chinese Dictionary.
      aug:
        au: Heijns, Audrey
        affil: School of Foreign Languages, Shenzhen University, China
      su:
        New words
        Chinese language
        Nineteenth century
        Compilers (Computer programs)
        Mathematical equivalence
      sug:
        subj:
          New words
          Chinese language
          Nineteenth century
          Compilers (Computer programs)
          Mathematical equivalence
      keyword:
        bilingual lexicography
        Chinese
        Dutch
        equivalence
        translation
      ab: Despite the consensus among scholars that it is impossible for equivalence to have the same meaning in linguistics as it does in mathematics – it is impossible to have equivalents in translation – there is still merit in investigating bilingual dictionaries as they can help us understand the different gradation and distinct types of equivalence and thus illustrate the problems that compilers faced. As a case study, this paper examines Gustaaf Schlegel's Dutch–Chinese dictionary, with occasional comparison to other dictionaries from the nineteenth century, in order to reconstruct Schlegel's aim of 'genuine Chinese equivalents'. Findings show that, in many instances, Schlegel is skilful in providing cognitive, explanatory or translational equivalents in terms of meaning and function, while providing useful information about the Chinese language and culture. Yet, in some cases, his attempts to find his so-called genuine equivalent fail, because he would not resort to the coining of new words, as other compilers did in that era.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N