Editor's Choice: Dual-process model of older adults' sedentary behavior: an ecological momentary assessment study.
Objective: A 10-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study was conducted to test a dual-process model of older adults' sedentary behavior. Design: Older adults (n = 104, 60–98 years) answered 6 EMA questionnaires/day to assess conscious processes (i.e. momentary intentions, self-efficacy to lim...
| Publicado en: | Psychology & Health Vol. 35; no. 5; pp. 519 - 538 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
May2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=142799270&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 142799270 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 08870446 7WK jtl: Psychology & Health issn: 08870446 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May2020 vid: 35 iid: 5 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 142799270 142799270 142799270 10.1080/08870446.2019.1666984 142799270 ppf: 519 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Editor's Choice: Dual-process model of older adults' sedentary behavior: an ecological momentary assessment study. aug: au: Maher, Jaclyn P. Dunton, Genevieve F. affil: Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC, USA sug: subj: Sedentary Behavior In Old Age Models, Theoretical Human Ecological Research Questionnaires Self-Efficacy Middle Age Aged Aged, 80 and Over Habits Intention Middle Aged: 45-64 years Aged: 65+ years Aged, 80 & over ab: Objective: A 10-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study was conducted to test a dual-process model of older adults' sedentary behavior. Design: Older adults (n = 104, 60–98 years) answered 6 EMA questionnaires/day to assess conscious processes (i.e. momentary intentions, self-efficacy to limit sedentary behavior over the next two hours) and wore an activPAL accelerometer to measure sedentary behavior. Habit strength for sedentary behavior, a non-conscious process, was self-reported at an introductory session. Main outcome measure: Time spent sitting in the two hours after the EMA prompt. Results: Older adults engaged in less sedentary behavior on occasions when their intentions (b = −1.63, p = 0.02) and self-efficacy (b = −2.01, p = 0.003) to limit sedentary behavior were stronger than one's average level of intentions or self-efficacy, respectively; however, older adults' average level of intentions (b = −5.30, p = 0.05) or self-efficacy (b = 2.77, p = 0.27) to limit sedentary behavior were not associated with sedentary behavior. Older adults with stronger sedentary behavior habits engaged in greater sedentary behavior in the two hours following the EMA prompt (b = 2.04, p = 0.006). Conclusion: Sedentary behavior is regulated by conscious and non-conscious processes. Interventions targeting older adults' sedentary behavior should promote momentary intention formation and self-efficacy beliefs to limit sitting as well as content to disrupt habitual sedentary behavior. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|