Evaluation of an indirect assessment for identifying tasks for functional analysis.
Although a demand analysis is helpful for identifying potential establishing operations for the functional analysis (FA) demand condition, it may not always be practical due to time constraints. A potential alternative is the Negative Reinforcement Rating Scale (NRRS), an indirect assessment tool th...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) Vol. 53; no. 2; pp. 997 - 1013 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Apr2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=142832941&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 142832941 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00218855 NRNO jtl: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) issn: 00218855 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2020 vid: 53 iid: 2 pid: 52269 pub: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. artinfo: ui: 142832941 142832941 142832941 10.1002/jaba.656 142832941 ppf: 997 ppct: 16 formats: tig: atl: Evaluation of an indirect assessment for identifying tasks for functional analysis. aug: au: Wiggins, Holly C. Roscoe, Eileen M. affil: Western New England University and The New England Center for Children sug: subj: Task Performance and Analysis Functional Assessment Clinical Assessment Tools Autism Spectrum Disorder Therapy Instrument Validation Human Reliability and Validity Interrater Reliability Validation Studies Health Behavior Descriptive Statistics ab: Although a demand analysis is helpful for identifying potential establishing operations for the functional analysis (FA) demand condition, it may not always be practical due to time constraints. A potential alternative is the Negative Reinforcement Rating Scale (NRRS), an indirect assessment tool that may serve as a time efficient alternative to a demand analysis. The experimenter assessed the reliability and validity of the NRRS for 5 individuals with autism spectrum disorder who exhibited problem behavior. Multiple types of interrater reliability were assessed across 2 informants, and NRRS outcomes were compared to a subsequent demand analysis and FA to assess its validity. Reliability was high (M = 84%) for NRRS numerical ratings of categories but low (M = 32.9%) for specific examples provided. NRRS‐identified highly aversive tasks yielded better correspondence with demand analysis outcomes than did NRRS‐identified less aversive tasks. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|