Partisan Targets of Media Fact-checking: Examining President Obama and the 113th Congress.
An analysis of statements by President Obama and by Democratic and Republican members of Congress selected for analysis by PolitiFact.com and Washington Post Fact Checker reveals that PolitiFact was more likely to find greater deceit in Republican rhetoric and that the Fact Checker was more negative...
| Publicado en: | Virginia Social Science Journal Vol. 53; pp. 51 - 63 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Virginia Social Science Association
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=143037345&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 143037345 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 05071305 LV4 jtl: Virginia Social Science Journal issn: 05071305 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2019 vid: 53 pid: 15131 pub: Virginia Social Science Association artinfo: ui: 143037345 ppf: 51 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.2MB tig: atl: Partisan Targets of Media Fact-checking: Examining President Obama and the 113th Congress. aug: au: FARNSWORTH, STEPHEN J. LICHTER, S. ROBERT affil: University of Mary Washington George Mason University su: United States. Congress. Senate Mass media Content analysis Presidents Fraud Deception Presidential candidates sug: subj: Mass media Content analysis Presidents Fraud Deception United States. Congress. Senate Presidential candidates ab: An analysis of statements by President Obama and by Democratic and Republican members of Congress selected for analysis by PolitiFact.com and Washington Post Fact Checker reveals that PolitiFact was more likely to find greater deceit in Republican rhetoric and that the Fact Checker was more negative overall in its assessments. Legislators who had more than one statement analyzed during the study period were disproportionally likely to be influential members of the House or Senate leadership or likely 2016 presidential candidates. The lawmakers selected for greater scrutiny were also more likely to be more ideologically extreme than the median members of their party caucuses. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|