Feminism Without Metaphysics or a Deflationary Account of Gender.

I argue for a deflationary answer to the question, "What is it to be a woman?" Prior attempts by feminist theorists to provide a metaphysical account of what all and only women have in common have all failed for the same reason: there is nothing women have in common beyond being women. Although the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Erkenntnis Vol. 85; no. 3; pp. 529 - 550
Autor principal: Antony, Louise
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=143396429&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 143396429
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01650106
        5KZ
      jtl: Erkenntnis
      issn: 01650106
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2020
      vid: 85
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        143396429
        10.1007/s10670-020-00243-2
      ppf: 529
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 618KB
      tig:
        atl: Feminism Without Metaphysics or a Deflationary Account of Gender.
      aug:
        au: Antony, Louise
        affil: University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
      su:
        Human reproduction
        Social institutions
        Feminism
        Gender
        Metaphysics
      sug:
        subj:
          Human reproduction
          Social institutions
          Feminism
          Gender
          Metaphysics
      ab: I argue for a deflationary answer to the question, "What is it to be a woman?" Prior attempts by feminist theorists to provide a metaphysical account of what all and only women have in common have all failed for the same reason: there is nothing women have in common beyond being women. Although the social kinds man and woman are primitive, their existence can be explained. I say that human sex difference is the material ground of systems of gender; gender systems serve to enable male control of female reproductive capacities. This explains the fact that most women are female, but it does not entail that all women are female or that all females are women. To clarify my position, I draw an analogy between the kind woman and the kind parent. While it is difficult to come up with necessary and sufficient conditions for being a parent, it is clear that the social institution or practice of parenting has its material ground in the biological facts about human reproduction together with facts about infantile dependency. Saying this does not entail that all and only biological progenitors are parents.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Erkenntnis is a copyright of Springer, 2020. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Erkenntnis
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N