Difference in specimen weights with semi-automatic cutting biopsy needles.
Purpose: To assess specimen weight difference of six types of semi-automatic cutting biopsy needles.Materials and Methods: We compared 18- and 20-gauge needles, one aspiration-type (STARCUT® aspiration-type, TSK Laboratory, Tochigi, Japan) and five non-aspiration-type (MISSION®, BARD, AZ; SuperCore™...
| Publicado en: | Japanese Journal of Radiology Vol. 38; no. 6; pp. 579 - 587 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=143396562&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 143396562 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 18671071 AUCM jtl: Japanese Journal of Radiology issn: 18671071 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2020 vid: 38 iid: 6 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 143396562 143396562 NLM32124166 10.1007/s11604-020-00935-3 NLM32124166 143396562 ppf: 579 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Difference in specimen weights with semi-automatic cutting biopsy needles. aug: au: Iguchi, Toshihiro Hiraki, Takao Matsui, Yusuke Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu Komaki, Toshiyuki Okamoto, Soichiro Fukuma, Shogo Tomita, Koji Uka, Mayu Kanazawa, Susumu affil: Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho kita-ku, 700-8558, Okayama, Japan sug: subj: Liver Pathology Specimen Handling Equipment and Supplies Animals Female Biopsy, Needle Equipment and Supplies Equipment Design Models, Biological Cattle Male Scales Female Male ab: Purpose: To assess specimen weight difference of six types of semi-automatic cutting biopsy needles.Materials and Methods: We compared 18- and 20-gauge needles, one aspiration-type (STARCUT® aspiration-type, TSK Laboratory, Tochigi, Japan) and five non-aspiration-type (MISSION®, BARD, AZ; SuperCore™, Argon Medical Devices, TX; Temno Evolution®, Care Fusion, IL; FINE CORE®, Toray Medical, Tokyo, Japan; Quick-Core®, Cook, IN) needles. Four biopsies were performed with each needle with the longest throw length on an excised bovine liver. The biopsies were repeated with new needles, four times with four different livers. STARCUT® was used both with and without aspiration.Results: Sixteen specimens were obtained with each needle. In needles of gauges, STARCUT® with aspiration provided the heaviest specimen and significantly heavier specimens were obtained with STARCUT® with aspiration (P < 0.05) than five non-aspiration-type needles. The specimen weight differed significantly (P < 0.001) among all 18- and 20-gauge needles. The specimen weights did not differ significantly between aspiration and non-aspiration biopsies with STARCUT® (6.32 vs. 5.97 mg with 18-gauge needle, P = 0.342; 1.95 vs. 1.92 mg with 20-gauge needle, P = 0.886).Conclusion: Although STARCUT® with aspiration provided the heaviest specimen, specimen weights were not significantly different between aspiration and non-aspiration biopsies. We assessed the specimen weight difference of six types of semi-automatic cutting biopsy needles. Significantly heavier specimens were obtained with STARCUT® with aspiration than the other needles. The specimen weight differed significantly among all 18- and 20-gauge needles but did not differ significantly between aspiration and non-aspiration biopsies with STARCUT®. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|