What Are We Missing? How Language Impacts Trauma Narratives.
The potential for the development of psychopathology in aolescent refugees and asylees is high due to the trauma inherent in their experience. Yet, psychopathology rooted in trauma has proven amenable to treatment. Nonetheless, as most clinicians are monolingual, the language difference between clin...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 153 - 162 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=143724829&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 143724829 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 19361521 4Z82 jtl: Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma issn: 19361521 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2020 vid: 13 iid: 2 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 143724829 143724829 143724829 10.1007/s40653-019-00263-3 143724829 ppf: 153 ppct: 9 formats: tig: atl: What Are We Missing? How Language Impacts Trauma Narratives. aug: au: Bailey, Cassandra McIntyre, Emily Arreola, Aleyda Venta, Amanda affil: Department of Psychology, Sam Houston State University, Campus Box 2447, 77341, Huntsville, TX, USA sug: subj: Immigrants Psychosocial Factors Psychological Trauma In Adolescence Language Narratives Communication Barriers Human Qualitative Studies Male Adolescence English as a Second Language Age Factors Sex Factors Female Anger Cognition Work Emotions Attitude to Death Health Status Spain United States Software Linguistics Adolescent: 13-18 years Male Female ab: The potential for the development of psychopathology in aolescent refugees and asylees is high due to the trauma inherent in their experience. Yet, psychopathology rooted in trauma has proven amenable to treatment. Nonetheless, as most clinicians are monolingual, the language difference between clinician and client may be a barrier of desensitization and processing typically characteristic of trauma therapy. Thus, this study aimed to describe qualitative differences in speech production among native and non-native narratives using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) processing software (Pennebaker et al. 2015) to understand if the current best practice will function similarly in these populations. We compared 10 adolescent immigrants (50% male) who narrated events that provoked their migration to the U.S. in their second language (L2; i.e., English) to 10 age- and gender-matched adolescents narrating in their first language (L1; i.e., Spanish). Results revealed L1 narratives were significantly higher in their use of/talk about anger, cognitive processes, discrepancy, tentativeness, perceptual processes, ingestion, relativity, time, work, and home. L2 narratives were higher in their use of/talk about positive emotions, death, causation, health, motion, space, and fillers. Findings have implications for the efficacy of treatments using discourse to ameliorate symptoms related to trauma in non-native languages. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|