AGAINST THE VIRTUAL: KLEINHERENBRINK'S EXTERNALITY THESIS AND DELEUZE'S MACHINE ONTOLOGY.
Reviewing Arjen Kleinherenbrink's recent book, Against Continuity: Gilles Deleuze's Speculative Realism (2019), this paper undertakes a detailed review of Kleinherenbrink's fourfold "externality thesis" vis-à-vis Deleuze's machine ontology. Reading Deleuze as a philosopher of the actual, this paper...
| Publicado en: | Cosmos & History Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 492 - 560 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Ashton & Rafferty
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=144038409&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 144038409 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 18329101 78JL jtl: Cosmos & History issn: 18329101 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2020 vid: 16 iid: 1 pid: 47219 pub: Ashton & Rafferty artinfo: ui: 144038409 ppf: 492 ppct: 68 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 3.5MB tig: atl: AGAINST THE VIRTUAL: KLEINHERENBRINK'S EXTERNALITY THESIS AND DELEUZE'S MACHINE ONTOLOGY. aug: au: Erkan, Ekin su: Deleuze, Gilles, 1925-1995 Ontology Externalities Theory of change Philosophers Realism sug: subj: Deleuze, Gilles, 1925-1995 Ontology Externalities Theory of change Philosophers Realism keyword: Deleuze Machine Ontology Object-Oriented Ontology Speculative Philosophy Speculative Realism ab: Reviewing Arjen Kleinherenbrink's recent book, Against Continuity: Gilles Deleuze's Speculative Realism (2019), this paper undertakes a detailed review of Kleinherenbrink's fourfold "externality thesis" vis-à-vis Deleuze's machine ontology. Reading Deleuze as a philosopher of the actual, this paper renders Deleuzean syntheses as passive contemplations, pulling other (passive) entities into an (active) experience and designating relations as expressed through contraction. In addition to reviewing Kleinherenbrink's book (which argues that the machine ontology is a guiding current that emerges in Deleuze's work after Difference and Repetition) alongside much of Deleuze's oeuvre, we relate and juxtapose Deleuze's machine ontology to positions concerning externality held by a host of speculative realists. Arguing that the machine ontology has its own account of interaction, change, and novelty, we ultimately set to prove that positing an ontological "cut" on behalf of the virtual realm is unwarranted because, unlike the realm of actualities, it is extraneous to the structure of becoming-that is, because it cannot be homogenous, any theory of change vis-à-vis the virtual makes it impossible to explain how and why qualitatively different actualities are produced. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Cosmos & History is the property of Ashton & Rafferty and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Cosmos & History holder: Ashton & Rafferty dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|