Calibration, Coherence, and Consilience in Radiometric Measures of Geologic Time.

In 2012, the Geological Time Scale, which sets the temporal framework for studying the timing and tempo of all major geological, biological, and climatic events in Earth's history, had one-quarter of its boundaries moved in a widespread revision of radiometric dates. The philosophy of metrology help...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 87; no. 3; pp. 425 - 457
Autor principal: Bokulich, Alisa
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Jul2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=144243019&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 144243019
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2020
      vid: 87
      iid: 3
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        144243019
        10.1086/708690
      ppf: 425
      ppct: 32
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1MB
      tig:
        atl: Calibration, Coherence, and Consilience in Radiometric Measures of Geologic Time.
      aug:
        au: Bokulich, Alisa
      su:
        Geological time scales
        Radioactive dating
      sug:
        subj:
          Geological time scales
          Radioactive dating
      ab: In 2012, the Geological Time Scale, which sets the temporal framework for studying the timing and tempo of all major geological, biological, and climatic events in Earth's history, had one-quarter of its boundaries moved in a widespread revision of radiometric dates. The philosophy of metrology helps us understand this episode, and it, in turn, elucidates the notions of calibration, coherence, and consilience. I argue that coherence testing is a distinct activity preceding calibration and consilience, and I highlight the value of discordant evidence and trade-offs scientists face in calibration. The iterative nature of calibration, moreover, raises the problem of legacy data.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N