Quantum Randomness and Underdetermination.

We consider the nature of quantum randomness and how one might have empirical evidence for it. We will see why, depending on one's computational resources, it may be impossible to determine whether a particular notion of randomness properly characterizes one's empirical data. Indeed, we will see why...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophy of Science Vol. 87; no. 3; pp. 391 - 409
Main Authors: Barrett, Jeffrey A., Huttegger, Simon M.
Format: Article
Published: Cambridge University Press Jul2020
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=144243024&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 144243024
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2020
      vid: 87
      iid: 3
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        144243024
        10.1086/708712
      ppf: 391
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 512KB
      tig:
        atl: Quantum Randomness and Underdetermination.
      aug:
        au:
          Barrett, Jeffrey A.
          Huttegger, Simon M.
      su:
        Quantum mechanics
        Quantum theory
      sug:
        subj:
          Quantum mechanics
          Quantum theory
      ab: We consider the nature of quantum randomness and how one might have empirical evidence for it. We will see why, depending on one's computational resources, it may be impossible to determine whether a particular notion of randomness properly characterizes one's empirical data. Indeed, we will see why even an ideal observer under ideal epistemic conditions may never have any empirical evidence whatsoever for believing that the results of one's quantum-mechanical experiments are randomly determined. This illustrates a radical sort of empirical underdetermination faced by fundamentally stochastic theories like quantum mechanics.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N