A Response To H. O. Mounce.

Wittgenstein: "If a lion could speak, we could not understand him." (PI, p. 223) Wittgenstein bids us to be wary of trying to explain or interpret language and its use, instead of limiting ourselves – with a rigorous discipline – to describing such use as comprehensively and clearly as we can. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Investigations Vol. 43; no. 3; pp. 287 - 290
Autor principal: Farman, Keith
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jul2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=144279049&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 144279049
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01900536
        BS4
      jtl: Philosophical Investigations
      issn: 01900536
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2020
      vid: 43
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        144279049
        10.1111/phin.12279
      ppf: 287
      ppct: 3
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 29KB
      tig:
        atl: A Response To H. O. Mounce.
      aug:
        au: Farman, Keith
        affil: University of Hertfordshire
      su:
        Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951
        Keller, Helen, 1880-1968
        Animal behavior
        Human beings
        Extrapolation
        Injunctions
        Lions
      sug:
        subj:
          Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951
          Keller, Helen, 1880-1968
          Animal behavior
          Human beings
          Extrapolation
          Injunctions
          Lions
      ab: Wittgenstein: "If a lion could speak, we could not understand him." (PI, p. 223) Wittgenstein bids us to be wary of trying to explain or interpret language and its use, instead of limiting ourselves – with a rigorous discipline – to describing such use as comprehensively and clearly as we can. This injunction, it seems to me, is important even when discussing 'normal', 'everyday' uses of language by fully sentient human beings, but even more so in such unique cases of sentient disability as Helen Keller's. As the above quote suggests, explanatory extrapolation from the behaviour of animals risks even greater philosophical confusion.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophical Investigations is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophical Investigations
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N