Cover Image
QR Code

The Eliza effect and its dangers: from demystification to gender critique.

This essay provides a gender critique of the Eliza effect. It delineates the way in which the Eliza effect is operationalised in AI research even as it is ostensibly demystified, for example, in the writings of Douglas Hofstadter and Joseph Weizenbaum. It then exposes the gendered assumptions embedd...

Full description

Published in:Journal for Cultural Research Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 1 - 16
Main Author: Dillon, Sarah
Format: Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Mar2020
Subjects:
Shaw, Bernard, 1856-1950
Personal assistants
Hazards
Gender
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=144422466&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 144422466
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14797585
        QMJ
      jtl: Journal for Cultural Research
      issn: 14797585
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2020
      vid: 24
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        144422466
        10.1080/14797585.2020.1754642
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 993KB
      tig:
        atl: The Eliza effect and its dangers: from demystification to gender critique.
      aug:
        au: Dillon, Sarah
        affil: Faculty of English, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
      su:
        Shaw, Bernard, 1856-1950
        Personal assistants
        Hazards
        Gender
      sug:
        subj:
          Shaw, Bernard, 1856-1950
          Personal assistants
          Hazards
          Gender
      keyword:
        artificial intelligence
        ELIZA
        gender
        Pygmalion
        Shaw
        Weizenbaum
      ab: This essay provides a gender critique of the Eliza effect. It delineates the way in which the Eliza effect is operationalised in AI research even as it is ostensibly demystified, for example, in the writings of Douglas Hofstadter and Joseph Weizenbaum. It then exposes the gendered assumptions embedded in the nomenclature used to name this misperception of the computer as having capabilities equivalent to the human. It traces the genealogy of that nomenclature back through Weizenbaum's ELIZA, to George Bernard Shaw's Pygmalion. A close reading of the play is deployed in order to reveal the structural inequities of gender, class, and who or what gets to be human, that are both explored in the play and encoded in the operation and operationalisations of the Eliza effect. It concludes by attending to that operation and operationalisation in relation to today's Virtual Personal Assistant's, and makes a case for the importance of critique in order to expose the inequitable structures of power obscured and compounded by the Eliza effect – both its name, and that which it names.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal for Cultural Research is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal for Cultural Research
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N