Cracking the code: how discursive structures shape climate engineering research governance.
There is increasing interest in developing anticipatory governance of climate engineering (CE) research. Discourse is the source code with which contested futures are written, shaping how future governance options can be imagined, designed and institutionalized. 'Cracking the code' underpinning the...
| Publicado en: | Environmental Politics Vol. 29; no. 5; pp. 890 - 917 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jul2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=144474552&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 144474552 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09644016 EIP jtl: Environmental Politics issn: 09644016 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2020 vid: 29 iid: 5 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 144474552 10.1080/09644016.2019.1670987 ppf: 890 ppct: 27 formats: tig: atl: Cracking the code: how discursive structures shape climate engineering research governance. aug: au: Boettcher, Miranda affil: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies e.V. (IASS), Potsdam, Germany Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany su: Sociology of knowledge Debate Discourse analysis Climate research Anticipatory governance International organization sug: subj: Sociology of knowledge Debate Discourse analysis Climate research Anticipatory governance International organization keyword: anticipatory governance climate engineering expert interviews sociology of knowledge anticipatory governance climate engineering expert interviews sociology of knowledge ab: There is increasing interest in developing anticipatory governance of climate engineering (CE) research. Discourse is the source code with which contested futures are written, shaping how future governance options can be imagined, designed and institutionalized. 'Cracking the code' underpinning the CE research governance debate can, therefore, help anticipate and critically reflect upon the ongoing constitution of governance. I present a sociology-of-knowledge-based discourse analysis (SKAD) of a series of interviews with governance experts from the US, the UK and Germany about a proposed Code of Conduct for climate engineering research. I illustrate how – by shaping what is defined as the object(s) of governance, why governance is considered necessary, and who is assigned the authority to govern – the underlying discursive structure of a given governance debate can shape governance development. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|