Difference in utilization of assistive technology across two racial groups in the aging population.

Background The utilization of assistive technology (AT) to enhance the quality of life has been well documented by disability researchers. However, the use across Black and White racial groups has been underexplored. Research Aim To update and extend the findings of Loggins et. al (Disabil Rehabil A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Gerontechnology Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. 206 - 215
Autores principales: Clay, Shondra Loggins, Alston, Reginald
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: International Society for Gerontechnology 2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=144595836&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 144595836
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15691101
        904R
      jtl: Gerontechnology
      issn: 15691101
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2019
      vid: 18
      iid: 4
      pid: 54298
      pub: International Society for Gerontechnology
    artinfo:
      ui:
        144595836
        144595836
        144595836
        10.4017/gt.2018.17.4.002.00
        144595836
      ppf: 206
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Difference in utilization of assistive technology across two racial groups in the aging population.
      aug:
        au:
          Clay, Shondra Loggins
          Alston, Reginald
        affil: Counseling Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 610 E. John Street-Office 117, Champaign, IL 61820, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Assistive Technology Utilization
          Health Resource Utilization In Old Age
          Health Services Accessibility
          Race Factors
          Socioeconomic Factors
          Human
          Aged
          Black Persons
          White Persons
          Descriptive Statistics
          Logistic Regression
          Insurance Coverage
          Employment Status
          Age Factors
          Health Care Costs
          Educational Status
          Income
          Marital Status
          Aged: 65+ years
      ab: Background The utilization of assistive technology (AT) to enhance the quality of life has been well documented by disability researchers. However, the use across Black and White racial groups has been underexplored. Research Aim To update and extend the findings of Loggins et. al (Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 9(6): 487-92, 2014) by examining the relationship between race, assistive technology (AT) use, selected demographic variables, and access to health care. Methods Using the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) database, descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were estimated. Results Consistent with previous findings, a higher percentage of Blacks used AT (16.7%) compared to Whites (11.6%), and predictive factors of AT use were education, employment status, income level, health coverage, medical costs, and age. Blacks were 25% more likely to use AT compared to Whites; however, Whites who used AT had more favorable demographic identifiers (e.g. married, higher education, more employment, higher income, more health coverage, and fewer concerns with medical costs) compared to Blacks who used AT. In contrast to previous findings, gender was not statistically significant, users of AT have higher income levels, and there were differences in the magnitude of predictors. Conclusion Whites and Blacks still have the same predictors of AT use; however, there are still differences in the magnitude. Whereas gender was no longer found to be a significant predictor of AT use, marital status was statistically significant. This study highlights the disruption in the typical pattern of AT use among Whites and Blacks and future research should continue to monitor this changing trend in racial disparities and AT use.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N