Identifying the guilty word: Simultaneous versus sequential lineups for DRM word lists.
Recent research in the eyewitness identification literature has investigated whether simultaneous or sequential lineups yield better discriminability. In standard eyewitness identification experiments, subjects view a mock-crime video and then are tested only once, requiring large samples for adequa...
| Publicado en: | Memory & Cognition Vol. 48; no. 6; pp. 903 - 920 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Aug2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=144745753&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 144745753 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0090502X MEG jtl: Memory & Cognition issn: 0090502X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2020 vid: 48 iid: 6 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 144745753 10.3758/s13421-020-01032-6 ppf: 903 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.4MB tig: atl: Identifying the guilty word: Simultaneous versus sequential lineups for DRM word lists. aug: au: Finley, Jason R. Wixted, John T. Roediger III, Henry L. affil: Department of Biological and Behavioral Sciences, Fontbonne University, 6800 Wydown Blvd, 63105, St. Louis, MO, USA Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA su: Discrimination (Sociology) Memory Recognition (Psychology) Task performance Research methodology Receiver operating characteristic curves sug: subj: Discrimination (Sociology) Memory Recognition (Psychology) Task performance Research methodology Receiver operating characteristic curves keyword: DRM Eyewitness memory Methodology ROC Word recognition DRM Eyewitness memory Methodology ROC Word recognition ab: Recent research in the eyewitness identification literature has investigated whether simultaneous or sequential lineups yield better discriminability. In standard eyewitness identification experiments, subjects view a mock-crime video and then are tested only once, requiring large samples for adequate power. However, there is no reason why theories of simultaneous versus sequential lineup performance cannot be tested using more traditional recognition memory tasks. In two experiments, subjects studied DRM (Deese-Roediger-McDermott) word lists (e.g., bed, rest, tired,...) and were tested using "lineups" in which six words were presented either simultaneously or sequentially. A studied word (e.g., tired) served as the guilty suspect in target-present lineups, unstudied related words (e.g., nap) served as fillers in target-present and target-absent lineups, and critical lures (e.g., sleep) were included in some target-present and target-absent lineups as well, to serve as attractive alternatives to the target word (or suspect). ROC analyses showed that the simultaneous test format generally yielded superior discriminability performance compared to the sequential test format, whether or not the critical lure was present in the lineup. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|