Ethical Considerations of Using Machine Learning for Decision Support in Occupational Health: An Example Involving Periodic Workers' Health Assessments.

Purpose Computer algorithms and Machine Learning (ML) will be integrated into clinical decision support within occupational health care. This will change the interaction between health care professionals and their clients, with unknown consequences. The aim of this study was to explore ethical consi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Vol. 30; no. 3; pp. 343 - 354
Autores principales: Six Dijkstra, Marianne W. M. C., Siebrand, Egbert, Dorrestijn, Steven, Salomons, Etto L., Reneman, Michiel F., Oosterveld, Frits G. J., Soer, Remko, Gross, Douglas P., Bieleman, Hendrik J.
Formato: case study review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Sep2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=144951466&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 144951466
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10530487
        JOR
      jtl: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
      issn: 10530487
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2020
      vid: 30
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        144951466
        143904869
        144951466
        144951466
        10.1007/s10926-020-09895-x
        144951466
      ppf: 343
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Ethical Considerations of Using Machine Learning for Decision Support in Occupational Health: An Example Involving Periodic Workers' Health Assessments.
      aug:
        au:
          Six Dijkstra, Marianne W. M. C.
          Siebrand, Egbert
          Dorrestijn, Steven
          Salomons, Etto L.
          Reneman, Michiel F.
          Oosterveld, Frits G. J.
          Soer, Remko
          Gross, Douglas P.
          Bieleman, Hendrik J.
        affil: School of Health, Saxion University of Applied Sciences/AGZ, M.H. Tromplaan 28, 7500 KB, Enschede, The Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Machine Learning Ethical Issues
          Decision Support Systems, Clinical Ethical Issues
          Occupational Health Evaluation
          Occupational Therapy Practice, Evidence-Based
          Philosophy, Medical
          Male
          Middle Age
          Occupational Health Services
          Professional Autonomy
          Beneficence
          Data Management
          Respect
          Consent
          Occupational Justice
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
      ab: Purpose Computer algorithms and Machine Learning (ML) will be integrated into clinical decision support within occupational health care. This will change the interaction between health care professionals and their clients, with unknown consequences. The aim of this study was to explore ethical considerations and potential consequences of using ML based decision support tools (DSTs) in the context of occupational health. Methods We conducted an ethical deliberation. This was supported by a narrative literature review of publications about ML and DSTs in occupational health and by an assessment of the potential impact of ML-DSTs according to frameworks from medical ethics and philosophy of technology. We introduce a hypothetical clinical scenario from a workers' health assessment to reflect on biomedical ethical principles: respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. Results Respect for autonomy is affected by uncertainty about what future consequences the worker is consenting to as a result of the fluctuating nature of ML-DSTs and validity evidence used to inform the worker. A beneficent advisory process is influenced because the three elements of evidence based practice are affected through use of a ML-DST. The principle of non-maleficence is challenged by the balance between group-level benefits and individual harm, the vulnerability of the worker in the occupational context, and the possibility of function creep. Justice might be empowered when the ML-DST is valid, but profiling and discrimination are potential risks. Conclusions Implications of ethical considerations have been described for the socially responsible design of ML-DSTs. Three recommendations were provided to minimize undesirable adverse effects of the development and implementation of ML-DSTs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        case study
        review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N