Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism.

Can robots have significant moral status? This is an emerging topic of debate among roboticists and ethicists. This paper makes three contributions to this debate. First, it presents a theory—'ethical behaviourism'—which holds that robots can have significant moral status if they are roughly perform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 2023 - 2050
Autor principal: Danaher, John
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=145047206&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 145047206
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13533452
        GNI
      jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics
      issn: 13533452
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2020
      vid: 26
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        145047206
        10.1007/s11948-019-00119-x
      ppf: 2023
      ppct: 27
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 797KB
      tig:
        atl: Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism.
      aug:
        au: Danaher, John
        affil: School of Law, NUI Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
      su:
        Robots
        Circle
      sug:
        subj:
          Robots
          Circle
      keyword:
        Ethical behaviourism
        Moral standing
        Moral status
        Procreative beneficence
      ab: Can robots have significant moral status? This is an emerging topic of debate among roboticists and ethicists. This paper makes three contributions to this debate. First, it presents a theory—'ethical behaviourism'—which holds that robots can have significant moral status if they are roughly performatively equivalent to other entities that have significant moral status. This theory is then defended from seven objections. Second, taking this theoretical position onboard, it is argued that the performative threshold that robots need to cross in order to be afforded significant moral status may not be that high and that they may soon cross it (if they haven't done so already). Finally, the implications of this for our procreative duties to robots are considered, and it is argued that we may need to take seriously a duty of 'procreative beneficence' towards robots.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2020. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Science & Engineering Ethics
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N