Brain Recording, Mind-Reading, and Neurotechnology: Ethical Issues from Consumer Devices to Brain-Based Speech Decoding.
Brain reading technologies are rapidly being developed in a number of neuroscience fields. These technologies can record, process, and decode neural signals. This has been described as 'mind reading technology' in some instances, especially in popular media. Should the public at large, be concerned...
| Publicado en: | Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 2295 - 2312 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Aug2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=145047225&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 145047225 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13533452 GNI jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics issn: 13533452 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2020 vid: 26 iid: 4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 145047225 10.1007/s11948-020-00218-0 ppf: 2295 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 608KB tig: atl: Brain Recording, Mind-Reading, and Neurotechnology: Ethical Issues from Consumer Devices to Brain-Based Speech Decoding. aug: au: Rainey, Stephen Martin, Stéphanie Christen, Andy Mégevand, Pierre Fourneret, Eric affil: Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Department of Basic Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland Braintech Lab (U 1205), Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France su: Telepathy Speech sug: subj: Telepathy Speech keyword: Language Mind reading Neuroethics Neuroprosthetics Neuroscience Neurotechnology Philosophy ab: Brain reading technologies are rapidly being developed in a number of neuroscience fields. These technologies can record, process, and decode neural signals. This has been described as 'mind reading technology' in some instances, especially in popular media. Should the public at large, be concerned about this kind of technology? Can it really read minds? Concerns about mind-reading might include the thought that, in having one's mind open to view, the possibility for free deliberation, and for self-conception, are eroded where one isn't at liberty to privately mull things over. Themes including privacy, cognitive liberty, and self-conception and expression appear to be areas of vital ethical concern. Overall, this article explores whether brain reading technologies are really mind reading technologies. If they are, ethical ways to deal with them must be developed. If they are not, researchers and technology developers need to find ways to describe them more accurately, in order to dispel unwarranted concerns and address appropriately those that are warranted. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2020. All Rights Reserved. item: Science & Engineering Ethics holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|