From Gegenstand to Gegenstehenlassen: On the Meanings of Objectivity in Heidegger and Hegel.
One of Heidegger's enduring concerns was to develop an original meditation on the meaning of (the presence of) the present. Integral to this attempt is his critique of the understanding of the being of beings in terms of the objectivity of the object. In this paper, I trace Heidegger's analyses of o...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Philosophical Studies Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 390 - 411 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jul2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=145050846&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 145050846 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09672559 5BE jtl: International Journal of Philosophical Studies issn: 09672559 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2020 vid: 28 iid: 3 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 145050846 10.1080/09672559.2020.1766883 ppf: 390 ppct: 21 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.5MB tig: atl: From Gegenstand to Gegenstehenlassen: On the Meanings of Objectivity in Heidegger and Hegel. aug: au: de Jong, Johan affil: Institute for Philosophy, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands su: Heidegger, John James, ca. 1659-1748 Metaphysics Phenomenology Paradox Archetypes sug: subj: Heidegger, John James, ca. 1659-1748 Metaphysics Phenomenology Paradox Archetypes keyword: hegel Heidegger object objectivity presence time ab: One of Heidegger's enduring concerns was to develop an original meditation on the meaning of (the presence of) the present. Integral to this attempt is his critique of the understanding of the being of beings in terms of the objectivity of the object. In this paper, I trace Heidegger's analyses of objectivity, through which Heidegger consistently establishes objectivity as non-primordial and derivative. In order to do this, however, Heidegger had to identify a specific, narrow (spatio-temporalized) conception of objectivity (in terms of Gegenstehenlassen and Vorstellen) as the hallmark of modern philosophy. I show that it is unclear whether that conception is a justified result or rather an unjustified presupposition of his approach. I then suggest what meanings of objectivity might be lost after Heidegger, by pointing to several aspects of Hegel's notion of objectivity that are incompatible with Heidegger's account, to wit: the lack of 'subject-object'-terminology in his definitions of objectivity; the special language of 'forms of' objectivity; Hegel's critique of representation; his notion of Gegenstand as a content with a categorical form, and, finally, that Aristotle's notion of hypokeimenon might provide a clue as to how Hegel's notion of object can be understood. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of International Journal of Philosophical Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: International Journal of Philosophical Studies holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|