Funding and Service Delivery in Rural and Urban Local US Health Departments in 2010 and 2016.

Objectives. To investigate differences in funding and service delivery between rural and urban local health departments (LHDs) in the United States. Methods. In this repeated cross-sectional study, we examined rural–urban differences in funding and service provision among LHDs over time using 2010 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Public Health Vol. 110; no. 9; pp. 1293 - 1300
Autores principales: Beatty, Kate, Heffernan, Megan, Hale, Nathan, Meit, Michael
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Public Health Association Sep2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=145072234&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 145072234
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00900036
        APH
      jtl: American Journal of Public Health
      issn: 00900036
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2020
      vid: 110
      iid: 9
      pid: 44
      pub: American Public Health Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        145072234
        10.2105/AJPH.2020.305757
      ppf: 1293
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Funding and Service Delivery in Rural and Urban Local US Health Departments in 2010 and 2016.
      aug:
        au:
          Beatty, Kate
          Heffernan, Megan
          Hale, Nathan
          Meit, Michael
      su:
        United States. Dept. of Health & Human Services
        Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (U.S.)
        Community health services
        Income
        Medical care
        Health policy
        Rural health services
        Urban health
        Government aid
        Cross-sectional method
        Financial management
      sug:
        subj:
          Community health services
          Income
          Medical care
          Health policy
          Rural health services
          Urban health
          Government aid
          Cross-sectional method
          United States. Dept. of Health & Human Services
          Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (U.S.)
          Community health centres
          All Other Outpatient Care Centers
          Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities
          Other local, municipal and regional public administration
          Other Individual and Family Services
          Administration of Public Health Programs
          Portfolio Management
          Administration of Human Resource Programs (except Education, Public Health, and Veterans' Affairs Programs)
          Financial management
      ab: Objectives. To investigate differences in funding and service delivery between rural and urban local health departments (LHDs) in the United States. Methods. In this repeated cross-sectional study, we examined rural–urban differences in funding and service provision among LHDs over time using 2010 and 2016 National Association of County and City Health Officials data. Results. Local revenue among urban LHDs (41.2%) was higher than that in large rural (31.3%) and small rural LHDs (31.2%; P <.05). Small (20.9%) and large rural LHDs (19.8%) reported greater reliance on revenue from Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services than urban LHDs (11.5%; P <.05). All experienced decreases in clinical revenue between 2010 and 2016. Urban LHDs provided less primary care services in 2016; rural LHDs provided more mental health and substance abuse services (P <.05). Conclusions. Urban LHDs generated more revenues from local sources, and rural LHDs generated more from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services and clinical services. Rural LHDs tended to provide more clinical services. Given rural LHDs' reliance on clinical revenue, decreases in clinical services could have disproportionate effects on them. Public Health Implications. Differences in financing and service delivery by rurality have an impact on the communities. Rural LHDs rely more heavily on state and federal dollars, which are vulnerable to changes in state and national health policy.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N