SOURCE AVAILABILITY AND E-VOTING: AN ADVOCATE RECANTS.

This article focuses on source-available e-voting software. Source-available software, whether proprietary or nonproprietary, has garnered significant attention. The arguments in favor of taking a source available approach in general are numerous, but only those of specific relevance to e-voting sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Communications of the ACM Vol. 47; no. 10; pp. 65 - 68
Autor principal: Kitcat, Jason
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Association for Computing Machinery Oct2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=14523110&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 14523110
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00010782
        ACM
      jtl: Communications of the ACM
      issn: 00010782
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2004
      vid: 47
      iid: 10
      pid: 68
      pub: Association for Computing Machinery
    artinfo:
      ui:
        14523110
        10.1145/1022594.1022625
      ppf: 65
      ppct: 3
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: SOURCE AVAILABILITY AND E-VOTING: AN ADVOCATE RECANTS.
      aug:
        au: Kitcat, Jason
        affil: SPRU, University of Sussex, U.K.
      su:
        Electronic voting
        Source code
        Cryptography
        Professional peer review
        Computer software
        Computer security
      sug:
        subj:
          Electronic voting
          Source code
          Cryptography
          Professional peer review
          Computer software
          Computer security
      ab: This article focuses on source-available e-voting software. Source-available software, whether proprietary or nonproprietary, has garnered significant attention. The arguments in favor of taking a source available approach in general are numerous, but only those of specific relevance to e-voting systems are discussed in this article. If a system's security is based on a secret design that becomes public knowledge, then security is compromised and the genie cannot be put back into the bottle. Cryptographers and security professionals use peer review to provide assurance for the quality of their systems. A security scheme whose source code and design is known, yet continues to offer a useful level of protection, is a good one. Changes to source code are difficult to prevent in an e-voting system, whether or not it uses source-available code. The same applies at the design level. This article shows that source-available software fails to address the fundamental challenges involved in adding technology to the voting process.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2004
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N