In defense of the semantic view of computation.
The semantic view of computation is the claim that semantic properties play an essential role in the individuation of physical computing systems such as laptops and brains. The main argument for the semantic view ("the master argument") rests on the fact that some physical systems simultaneously imp...
| Publicado en: | Synthese Vol. 197; no. 9; pp. 4083 - 4109 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Sep2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=145269425&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 145269425 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00397857 4LI jtl: Synthese issn: 00397857 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2020 vid: 197 iid: 9 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 145269425 10.1007/s11229-018-01921-z ppf: 4083 ppct: 26 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 619KB tig: atl: In defense of the semantic view of computation. aug: au: Shagrir, Oron affil: Departments of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus, 91905, Jerusalem, Israel su: Oxford University Press Computer systems Individuation (Psychology) Robots Mathematical equivalence sug: subj: Oxford University Press Computer systems Individuation (Psychology) Robots Mathematical equivalence keyword: Computation Externalism Implementation Individuation Mechanism Semantic properties ab: The semantic view of computation is the claim that semantic properties play an essential role in the individuation of physical computing systems such as laptops and brains. The main argument for the semantic view ("the master argument") rests on the fact that some physical systems simultaneously implement different automata at the same time, in the same space, and even in the very same physical properties ("simultaneous implementation"). Recently, several authors have challenged this argument (Piccinini in Philos Stud 137:205–241, 2008, Piccinini in Physical computation: a mechanistic account, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015; Coelho Mollo in Synthese 195:3477–3497, 2018; Dewhurst in Br J Philos Sci 69:103–116, 2018). They accept the premise of simultaneous implementation but reject the semantic conclusion. In this paper, I aim to explicate the semantic view and to address these objections. I first characterize the semantic view and distinguish it from other, closely related views. Then, I contend that the master argument for the semantic view survives the counter-arguments against it. One counter-argument is that computational individuation is not forced to choose between the implemented automata but rather always picks out a more basic computational structure. My response is that this move might undermine the notion of computational equivalence. Another counter-argument is that while computational individuation is forced to rely on extrinsic features, these features need not be semantic. My reply is that the semantic view better accounts for these extrinsic features than the proposed non-semantic alternatives. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2020. All Rights Reserved. item: Synthese holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|