"There Are Things I Want to Say But You Do Not Ask": a Comparison Between Standardised and Individualised Evaluations in Substance Use Treatment.
There has been an increasing call for service users to be more actively involved with the evaluation of treatment outcomes. One strategy to impove such involvement is to ask service users to contribute with their own criteria for evaluation by sharing their personal story and perspective about their...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. 861 - 875 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Aug2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=145305302&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 145305302 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15571874 46AW jtl: International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction issn: 15571874 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2020 vid: 18 iid: 4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 145305302 10.1007/s11469-018-9985-6 ppf: 861 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 571KB tig: atl: "There Are Things I Want to Say But You Do Not Ask": a Comparison Between Standardised and Individualised Evaluations in Substance Use Treatment. aug: au: Alves, Paula Cristina Gomes Sales, Célia Maria Dias Ashworth, Mark Faísca, Luís affil: Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper 3rd Floor, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, NW3 2PF, London, UK Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Centro de Psicologia da Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal Division of Health and Social Care Research Departamento de Psicologia (FCHS) e Centre for Biomedical Research (CBMR), Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal su: Interpersonal relations Cross-sectional method Treatment effectiveness Comparator circuits sug: subj: Interpersonal relations Cross-sectional method Treatment effectiveness Comparator circuits keyword: Individualised measures Personalised assessment Standardised measures Substance use treatment evaluation Individualised measures Personalised assessment Standardised measures Substance use treatment evaluation ab: There has been an increasing call for service users to be more actively involved with the evaluation of treatment outcomes. One strategy to impove such involvement is to ask service users to contribute with their own criteria for evaluation by sharing their personal story and perspective about their clinical situation. In this cross-sectional study, we contrasted the contents elicited by service users completing two individualised measures against the contents of three widely used standardised measures. We also compared two methods to generate individualised data using self-report and interview-based instruments (PSYCHLOPS and PQ). Following a thematic comparison approach, we found that one quarter of the problems reported by patients in individualised measures were not covered by any of our standardised comparators. Also, half of our sample generated at least one problem whose theme was not covered by any of the three standardised measures. We also found that patients in this population have many other concerns beyond drug use. These included psychological (e.g. interpersonal relationships) and socio-economic (e.g. money) problems, which were frequently reported. Our study suggests that listening to service users' stories allows us to capture issues of importance to service users in substance use treatment, which may be underestimated by standardised measures. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|