Prospective, Multicenter Feasibility Study to Evaluate Differential Target Multiplexed Spinal Cord Stimulation Programming in Subjects With Chronic Intractable Back Pain With or Without Leg Pain.

Objective: This prospective, open‐label, multicenter study evaluated the feasibility of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy programming for chronic low back pain that uses multiple electrical pulsed signals (Differential Target Multiplexed). Methods: Twenty‐five SCS candidates with low back pain e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Pain Practice Vol. 20; no. 7; pp. 761 - 769
Autores principales: Fishman, Michael A., Calodney, Aaron, Kim, Philip, Slezak, Jan, Benyamin, Ramsin, Rehman, Atiq, Soto, Eliezer, Yang, Thomas, Hacobian, Asteghik, Griffith, Lee, Yu, Cong, Vallejo, Ricardo
Formato: clinical trial pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=145719083&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 145719083
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15307085
        HYN
      jtl: Pain Practice
      issn: 15307085
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2020
      vid: 20
      iid: 7
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        145719083
        145719083
        145719083
        10.1111/papr.12908
        145719083
      ppf: 761
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Prospective, Multicenter Feasibility Study to Evaluate Differential Target Multiplexed Spinal Cord Stimulation Programming in Subjects With Chronic Intractable Back Pain With or Without Leg Pain.
      aug:
        au:
          Fishman, Michael A.
          Calodney, Aaron
          Kim, Philip
          Slezak, Jan
          Benyamin, Ramsin
          Rehman, Atiq
          Soto, Eliezer
          Yang, Thomas
          Hacobian, Asteghik
          Griffith, Lee
          Yu, Cong
          Vallejo, Ricardo
        affil: Center for Interventional Pain and Spine, Exton Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
      sug:
        subj:
          Spinal Cord Stimulation Methods
          Pain Management Methods
          Chronic Pain Therapy
          Low Back Pain Therapy
          Leg Pathology
          Pain Therapy
          Treatment Outcomes
          Human
          Prospective Studies
          Multicenter Studies
          Pilot Studies
          United States
          Descriptive Statistics
          Scales
          Pain Measurement
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Clinical Trials
          Electrodes, Implanted
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
      ab: Objective: This prospective, open‐label, multicenter study evaluated the feasibility of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy programming for chronic low back pain that uses multiple electrical pulsed signals (Differential Target Multiplexed). Methods: Twenty‐five SCS candidates with low back pain equal to or greater than lower limb pain were enrolled at 7 sites in the United States. The subjects evaluated standard and Differential Target Multiplexed programs, each for 4 ± 1 days. A commercially available SCS trial system was used for standard SCS therapy programming. During the trialing of the multiplexed programs, implanted temporary leads were connected to an investigational external trial stimulator system. Results: Twenty subjects concluded the study. The mean baseline numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score for low back pain was 7.4, with a mean age of 62.4 years and mean pain duration of 18.0 years. Significant relief in back pain was observed for both treatments, with significantly better response with multiplexed programming. At the end of the trial period, subjects reported a reduction in their mean NPRS score from baseline to 4.2 after standard programming and to 2.4 after Differential Target Multiplexed programming. The difference between standard and multiplexed programming was significant. The responder rate for low back pain relief was 50% for standard programming and 80% for Differential Target Multiplexed programming. Eighty‐five percent of subjects who evaluated both programming approaches preferred Differential Target Multiplexed SCS. Conclusion: In this difficult‐to‐treat patient population, subjects reported significant reduction in chronic back pain when using multiplexed programming. A randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm the results from this feasibility study.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        clinical trial
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N