Categorising Electronic Music.

When seemingly automated technologies display biases usually defined as discriminatory human behaviours, these tendencies are referred to collectively as 'sociotechnical bias'. In this article, I explore facets of racial and gendered sociotechnical bias apparent in the musical categorisation strateg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Contemporary Music Review Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 231 - 252
Autor principal: Sofer, Danielle
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Apr2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=145732286&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 145732286
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07494467
        7VR
      jtl: Contemporary Music Review
      issn: 07494467
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2020
      vid: 39
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        145732286
        10.1080/07494467.2020.1806628
      ppf: 231
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 649KB
      tig:
        atl: Categorising Electronic Music.
      aug:
        au: Sofer, Danielle
      su:
        Digital humanities
        Sex discrimination
        Database administration
        Computer science
        Electronic music
      sug:
        subj:
          Digital humanities
          Sex discrimination
          Database administration
          Computer science
          Electronic music
      keyword:
        Categorisation
        Electroacoustic
        Electronic Music
        Gender
        Modularity
        Race
      ab: When seemingly automated technologies display biases usually defined as discriminatory human behaviours, these tendencies are referred to collectively as 'sociotechnical bias'. In this article, I explore facets of racial and gendered sociotechnical bias apparent in the musical categorisation strategies of the database Répertoire International de Littérature Musicale Abstracts of Musical Literature (1967–present only)—or RILM. The article shows how concerns about sociotechnical transparency raised in the digital humanities and computer science are also embedded in musical technologies to advocate for greater awareness and action regarding implicit biases currently operating in musical spheres. The article finds that shared technology among many kinds of electronic music facilitates a kind of musical 'code-switching' across genres that, if attuned to appropriately in database administration and keyword designations, would minimise racializing and gendering biases in electronic music categorisation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Contemporary Music Review is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Contemporary Music Review
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N