Debugging the case for creationism.

Repeatable artworks like musical works have presented theorists in the ontology of art with a puzzle. They seem in some respects like eternal, immutable objects and in others like created, historical objects. Creationists have embraced the latter appearances and attempted to compel Platonists to fol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 177; no. 11; pp. 3509 - 3528
Autor principal: Grafton-Cardwell, Patrick
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=145997208&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 145997208
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2020
      vid: 177
      iid: 11
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        145997208
        10.1007/s11098-019-01380-3
      ppf: 3509
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 276KB
      tig:
        atl: Debugging the case for creationism.
      aug:
        au: Grafton-Cardwell, Patrick
        affil: University of Massachusetts Amherst, E305 South College, 150 Hicks Way, 01003, Amherst, MA, USA
      su:
        Works of art in art
        Theorists
        Art
        Platonists
        Debate
      sug:
        subj:
          Works of art in art
          Theorists
          Art
          Platonists
          Debate
      keyword:
        Creationism
        Metaontology
        Metaphysics
        Music
        Platonism
      ab: Repeatable artworks like musical works have presented theorists in the ontology of art with a puzzle. They seem in some respects like eternal, immutable objects and in others like created, historical objects. Creationists have embraced the latter appearances and attempted to compel Platonists to follow them. I examine in detail each argument in a cumulative case for Creationism, showing how the Platonist can respond. The conclusion is that the debate between Platonists and Creationists is a stalemate. In order for progress to be made in the first-order debate, second-order progress on the metaontology of art needs to come first.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2020. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N