Presidential Versus Parliamentary Systems: Where Do Female Entrepreneurs Thrive?

Objective: This article examines whether female managers and female owners of firms are better empowered in presidential or parliamentary democracies. Parliamentary democracies might be more responsive to the demands of special interest groups, while government decision making might be more streamli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell) Vol. 101; no. 5; pp. 1773 - 1789
Autores principales: Goel, Rajeev K., Nelson, Michael A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=146139730&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 146139730
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00384941
        SSQ
      jtl: Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell)
      issn: 00384941
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2020
      vid: 101
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        146139730
        10.1111/ssqu.12851
      ppf: 1773
      ppct: 16
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Presidential Versus Parliamentary Systems: Where Do Female Entrepreneurs Thrive?
      aug:
        au:
          Goel, Rajeev K.
          Nelson, Michael A.
        affil:
          Illinois State University and Kiel Institute for the World Economy
          University of Akron
      su:
        Intergenerational mobility
        Class differences
        Sociodemographic factors
        Political trust (in government)
        United States politics & government
      sug:
        subj:
          Intergenerational mobility
          Class differences
          Sociodemographic factors
          Political trust (in government)
          United States politics & government
      ab: Objective: This article examines whether female managers and female owners of firms are better empowered in presidential or parliamentary democracies. Parliamentary democracies might be more responsive to the demands of special interest groups, while government decision making might be more streamlined in presidential democracies. Methods: We use firm‐level data from the World Bank for more than 100 emerging and developing nations and employ the logistic estimation procedure. Results: Results show that female owners of firms thrive in presidential democracies, but the effects on female managers were largely statistically insignificant. Other interesting findings include both female managers and female owners facing special challenges in nations with greater gender inequality, with female owners benefiting in nations with a larger informal sector. Conclusions: Our results show that the type of democracy is relevant in female entrepreneurship, with female owners of firms thriving in presidential democracies, but not necessarily female managers.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N