Southern Accents and Partisan Stereotypes: Evaluating Political Candidates.

Objective: Recent research suggests that many American voters use candidate accents as an evaluative heuristic. We build on this research by examining whether this effect is conditional on the partisan positions of the candidate and across participant party identification. Methods: We designed an ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell) Vol. 101; no. 5; pp. 1951 - 1969
Autores principales: Ash, Kathleen, Johnson, Wesley, Lagadinos, Gracie, Simon, Sarah, Thomas, Jared, Wright, Evan, Gainous, Jason
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=146139740&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 146139740
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00384941
        SSQ
      jtl: Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell)
      issn: 00384941
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2020
      vid: 101
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        146139740
        10.1111/ssqu.12862
      ppf: 1951
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Southern Accents and Partisan Stereotypes: Evaluating Political Candidates.
      aug:
        au:
          Ash, Kathleen
          Johnson, Wesley
          Lagadinos, Gracie
          Simon, Sarah
          Thomas, Jared
          Wright, Evan
          Gainous, Jason
        affil: University of Louisville
      su:
        Class differences
        Sociodemographic factors
        United States presidential elections
        Political trust (in government)
        United States politics & government
      sug:
        subj:
          Class differences
          Sociodemographic factors
          Executive Offices
          United States presidential elections
          Political trust (in government)
          United States politics & government
      ab: Objective: Recent research suggests that many American voters use candidate accents as an evaluative heuristic. We build on this research by examining whether this effect is conditional on the partisan positions of the candidate and across participant party identification. Methods: We designed an experiment using actors to record candidate stump speeches, manipulating the accent of the candidate and the partisan issue position of the candidate. Results: Democrats and Republicans in our sample were more likely to believe candidates with southern accents were Republican as opposed Democrat, and were also more likely to negatively evaluate candidates with a southern accent. This was true in both instances regardless of whether the candidate espoused a typical Democratic or Republican issue position. Democrats' judgments of candidates with southern accents, though, were harsher than those of Republicans and, again, this was the case across the partisan positioning of the candidate. Finally, both Democrats and Republicans in our pool were less likely to say they would vote for the candidate with a southern accent regardless of the partisan position of the candidate. Conclusion: Our results confirm that accent is a heuristic and add nuance to our understanding of how partisanship shapes this effect.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N