Making and Un-making the Hegelian Middle.
This extensive collection of essays is a thorough elaboration of the now well-established thesis that Hegelian philosophy and Canadian socio-political history have an intimate relationship. For example, Canadian history has required collaboration and negotiation between groups, most recently express...
| Publicado en: | University of Toronto Quarterly Vol. 88; no. 4; pp. 367 - 382 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Toronto Press
Fall2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=146154236&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 146154236 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00420247 UTQ jtl: University of Toronto Quarterly issn: 00420247 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Fall2019 vid: 88 iid: 4 pid: 678 pub: University of Toronto Press artinfo: ui: 146154236 10.3138/utq.88.4.04 ppf: 367 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 484KB tig: atl: Making and Un-making the Hegelian Middle. aug: au: ANGUS, IAN affil: Professor, Emeritus, Department of Humanities, Simon Fraser University. su: Canadian philosophy Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, 1770-1831 Multiculturalism Grant, George Parkin, 1918-1988 Fackenheim, Emil L., 1916-2003 sug: subj: Canadian philosophy Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, 1770-1831 Multiculturalism Grant, George Parkin, 1918-1988 Fackenheim, Emil L., 1916-2003 keyword: Charles Taylor Emil Fackenheim George Grant Hegel ab: This extensive collection of essays is a thorough elaboration of the now well-established thesis that Hegelian philosophy and Canadian socio-political history have an intimate relationship. For example, Canadian history has required collaboration and negotiation between groups, most recently expressed in multiculturalism, which would be expressed through a specifically Canadian form of Hegelian dialectic. The collection centers on five Canadian “Hegeliansâ€â€”Emil Fackenheim, James Doull, George Grant, Charles Taylor, and Henry S. Harris— who have either made significant contributions to Hegelian scholarship, or its application to Canadian issues, or both. Grouping these five as Hegelians minimizes the fact that both George Grant and Emil Fackenheim explicitly rejected Hegelian philosophy due to its inability to adequately formulate the relationship between particularity and universality. Resolution of dialectical oppositions is described in the various essays of this collection in many different ways: as compromise, tension, consensus, moderation, communication across differences, promise, etc. The cumulative effect is to suggest that any sort of difference will be framed as dialectical opposition, and thus as Hegelian, by these authors. This framing excludes from consideration one significant other manner of conceiving of the Canadian Geist as devolution of state power. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of University of Toronto Quarterly is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: University of Toronto Quarterly holder: University of Toronto Press dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|