Prediction of Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses: Machine Learning-Based CT Texture Analysis.

Rationale and Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether benign and malignant renal solid masses could be distinguished through machine learning (ML)-based computed tomography (CT) texture analysis.Materials and Methods: Seventy-nine patients with 84 solid renal masses (21 benign; 63 malign...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Academic Radiology Vol. 27; no. 10; pp. 1422 - 1430
Autores principales: Erdim, Cagri, Yardimci, Aytul Hande, Bektas, Ceyda Turan, Kocak, Burak, Koca, Sevim Baykal, Demir, Hale, Kilickesmez, Ozgur
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Oct2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Rationale and Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether benign and malignant renal solid masses could be distinguished through machine learning (ML)-based computed tomography (CT) texture analysis.Materials and Methods: Seventy-nine patients with 84 solid renal masses (21 benign; 63 malignant) from a single center were included in this retrospective study. Malignant masses included common renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes: clear cell RCC, papillary cell RCC, and chromophobe RCC. Benign masses are represented by oncocytomas and fat-poor angiomyolipomas. Following preprocessing steps, a total of 271 texture features were extracted from unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT images. Dimension reduction was done with a reliability analysis and then with a feature selection algorithm. A nested-approach was used for feature selection, model optimization, and validation. Eight ML algorithms were used for the classifications: decision tree, locally weighted learning, k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, logistic regression, support vector machine, neural network, and random forest.Results: The number of features with good reproducibility was 198 for unenhanced CT and 244 for contrast-enhanced CT. Random forest algorithm demonstrated the best predictive performance using five selected contrast-enhanced CT texture features. The accuracy and area under the curve metrics were 90.5% and 0.915, respectively. Having eliminated the highly collinear features from the analysis, the accuracy and area under the curve values slightly increased to 91.7% and 0.916, respectively.Conclusion: ML-based contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis might be a potential method for distinguishing benign and malignant solid renal masses with satisfactory performance.