Pronominal typology and the de se/de re distinction.

This paper investigates how regular pronominal typology interfaces with de se and de re interpretations, and highlights a correlation between strong pronouns (descriptively speaking) and de re interpretations, and weak pronouns and de se interpretations. In order to illustrate this correlation, I co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Linguistics & Philosophy Vol. 43; no. 5; pp. 537 - 588
Main Author: Patel-Grosz, Pritty
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Oct2020
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=146175843&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 146175843
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01650157
        OJI
      jtl: Linguistics & Philosophy
      issn: 01650157
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2020
      vid: 43
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        146175843
        10.1007/s10988-019-09274-7
      ppf: 537
      ppct: 51
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.8MB
      tig:
        atl: Pronominal typology and the de se/de re distinction.
      aug:
        au: Patel-Grosz, Pritty
        affil: Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1102, Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway
      su:
        Pronouns
        Similarity (Language learning)
        English pronouns
        Statutory interpretation
        Sauerland (Germany)
      sug:
        subj:
          Sauerland (Germany)
          Pronouns
          Similarity (Language learning)
          English pronouns
          Statutory interpretation
      keyword:
        Attitude reports
        De se/de re
      ab: This paper investigates how regular pronominal typology interfaces with de se and de re interpretations, and highlights a correlation between strong pronouns (descriptively speaking) and de re interpretations, and weak pronouns and de se interpretations. In order to illustrate this correlation, I contrast different pronominal forms within a single language, null versus overt pronouns in Kutchi Gujarati, and clitic versus full pronouns in Austrian Bavarian. I argue that the data presented here provide cross-linguistic comparative support for the idea of a dedicated de se LF as argued for by Percus and Sauerland.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Linguistics & Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2020. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Linguistics & Philosophy
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N