Reference to ad hoc kinds.

Although there is no consensus about what kinds are, there is a common understanding that kinds can be regarded as collections of objects that share certain properties. What these properties exactly are is often left unspecified. This paper explores the semantics of ad hoc kind-referring terms, wher...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Linguistics & Philosophy Vol. 43; no. 6; pp. 589 - 632
Autor principal: Mendia, Jon Ander
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=146175846&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 146175846
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01650157
        OJI
      jtl: Linguistics & Philosophy
      issn: 01650157
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2020
      vid: 43
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        146175846
        10.1007/s10988-019-09280-9
      ppf: 589
      ppct: 43
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 542KB
      tig:
        atl: Reference to ad hoc kinds.
      aug:
        au: Mendia, Jon Ander
        affil: Department of Linguistics, Heinrich-Heine University, Universitätsstrs. 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
      su:
        Consensus (Social sciences)
        Theory of knowledge
        Thesis statements (Rhetoric)
        Semantics
        Acquisition of data
      sug:
        subj:
          Consensus (Social sciences)
          Theory of knowledge
          Thesis statements (Rhetoric)
          Semantics
          Acquisition of data
      keyword:
        Amount relatives
        Kind reference
        Partitions
        Relative clauses
      ab: Although there is no consensus about what kinds are, there is a common understanding that kinds can be regarded as collections of objects that share certain properties. What these properties exactly are is often left unspecified. This paper explores the semantics of ad hoc kind-referring terms, where the determination of the relevant set of shared properties does not rely on "natural" properties or world knowledge. Rather, information provided by a nominal modifier, typically a relative clause, is used to impute the required regular behavior on the kind-referring NP. Building on Carlson's (Reference to kinds in English, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 1977b) disjointness condition, I show that we can not only account for the ubiquity of these expressions, but we can also extend the analysis to other constructions that have traditionally not been taken to be kind referring, such as Amount and Degree Relative constructions.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Linguistics & Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2020. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Linguistics & Philosophy
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N