Pragmatic constraints do not prevent the co-activation of alternative names: evidence from sequential naming tasks with one and two speakers.
We investigated whether the phonological co-activation of alternative names in picture naming (e.g. "fish" for target "shark") is reduced by contextual constraints which render them inappropriate. In the constraining context, the target naming response was preceded by a naming response to an object...
| Publicado en: | Language, Cognition & Neuroscience Vol. 35; no. 8; pp. 1073 - 1089 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Oct2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=146195876&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 146195876 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 23273798 IQ6T jtl: Language, Cognition & Neuroscience issn: 23273798 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2020 vid: 35 iid: 8 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 146195876 145611309 146195876 146195876 10.1080/23273798.2020.1727539 146195876 ppf: 1073 ppct: 16 formats: tig: atl: Pragmatic constraints do not prevent the co-activation of alternative names: evidence from sequential naming tasks with one and two speakers. aug: au: Mädebach, Andreas Kurtz, Franziska Schriefers, Herbert Jescheniak, Jörg D. affil: Center for Brain and Cognition, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain sug: subj: Language Processing Phonetics Visual Perception Task Performance and Analysis Human Speech Production Measurement Communication Speech Perception ab: We investigated whether the phonological co-activation of alternative names in picture naming (e.g. "fish" for target "shark") is reduced by contextual constraints which render them inappropriate. In the constraining context, the target naming response was preceded by a naming response to an object from the same category (e.g. an eel) which remained visible during target naming. Therefore, use of the alternative target name "fish" would result (a) in an ambiguous response because of the visual context and (b) in a pragmatically odd response because of the previous naming response. In Experiment 1 the context pictures were named by the participants themselves and in Experiment 2 by a communication partner. In both experiments, interference from distractor words phonologically related ("finger") versus unrelated ("book") to the alternative name was observed regardless of context. This finding indicates limited flexibility in lexical activation during speech planning. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|