Reliability of B-line quantification by different-level observers and a software algorithm using point-of-care lung ultrasound.

Quantification of B-lines on lung ultrasonographs is operator-dependent and considered a semi-quantitative method. To avoid this variability, we designed a software algorithm for counting B-lines. We compared the number of B-lines obtained in real-time by observers with three different levels of exp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing Vol. 34; no. 6; pp. 1259 - 1265
Main Authors: Pičuljan, Ana, Šustić, Marko, Brumini, Gordana, Kuharić, Janja, Šustić, Alan
Format: Journal Article
Published: Springer Nature Dec2020
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=146381670&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 146381670
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13871307
        OHC
      jtl: Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing
      issn: 13871307
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2020
      vid: 34
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        146381670
        146381670
        NLM31823209
        10.1007/s10877-019-00440-7
        NLM31823209
        146381670
      ppf: 1259
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Reliability of B-line quantification by different-level observers and a software algorithm using point-of-care lung ultrasound.
      aug:
        au:
          Pičuljan, Ana
          Šustić, Marko
          Brumini, Gordana
          Kuharić, Janja
          Šustić, Alan
        affil: Department of Anesthesiology, Reanimatology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Br. Branchetta 20, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia
      sug:
        subj:
          Clinical Information Systems
          Algorithms
          Prospective Studies
          Reproducibility of Results
          Observer Bias
          Ultrasonography
          Lung
          Software
          Adult
          Adult: 19-44 years
      ab: Quantification of B-lines on lung ultrasonographs is operator-dependent and considered a semi-quantitative method. To avoid this variability, we designed a software algorithm for counting B-lines. We compared the number of B-lines obtained in real-time by observers with three different levels of experience and by the software algorithm, and analyzed intra-rater variability in terms of the estimated number of B-lines in two successive examinations. Forty mechanically ventilated adult (≥ 18 years) intensive care unit patients were included in this prospective study. All patients underwent two consecutive ultrasound examinations for B-lines detection by three human observers (OB1 = high, OB2 = medium, OB3 = low level of experience) and by the software (OBS). Ultrasound scans were obtained on the anterior right and left thoracic side along the midclavicular line, in the second and fourth intercostal space; B-lines counting for each position lasted 10 s. To assess intra-observer variability, a second ultrasound scan was obtained 15-30 min after the first scan. For all lung zones, the intraclass correlation for B-lines counting between OB1 and OB2 was 0.663; between OB1 and OB3, 0.559; and between OB1 and OBS, 0.710. OBS had a better concordance coefficient (0.752) between the first and the second measurements than did the human observers. Our results show that the software algorithm for B-lines counting is a potentially promising alternative when observers have little lung ultrasound experience.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N