In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability.

One of the main difficulties in assessing artificial intelligence (AI) is the tendency for people to anthropomorphise it. This becomes particularly problematic when we attach human moral activities to AI. For example, the European Commission's High-level Expert Group on AI (HLEG) have adopted the po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 26; no. 5; pp. 2749 - 2768
Autor principal: Ryan, Mark
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Oct2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=146390925&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 146390925
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13533452
        GNI
      jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics
      issn: 13533452
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2020
      vid: 26
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        146390925
        10.1007/s11948-020-00228-y
      ppf: 2749
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 629KB
      tig:
        atl: In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability.
      aug:
        au: Ryan, Mark
        affil: The Division of Philosophy, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
      su:
        European Commission
        Artificial intelligence
        Simple machines
        Artificial intelligence & ethics
        Definitions
      sug:
        subj:
          European Commission
          Artificial intelligence
          Simple machines
          Artificial intelligence & ethics
          Definitions
      keyword:
        Artificial intelligence ethics
        European commission high-level expert group
        Philosophy of trust
        Reliability
        Trustworthy AI
      ab: One of the main difficulties in assessing artificial intelligence (AI) is the tendency for people to anthropomorphise it. This becomes particularly problematic when we attach human moral activities to AI. For example, the European Commission's High-level Expert Group on AI (HLEG) have adopted the position that we should establish a relationship of trust with AI and should cultivate trustworthy AI (HLEG AI Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI, 2019, p. 35). Trust is one of the most important and defining activities in human relationships, so proposing that AI should be trusted, is a very serious claim. This paper will show that AI cannot be something that has the capacity to be trusted according to the most prevalent definitions of trust because it does not possess emotive states or can be held responsible for their actions—requirements of the affective and normative accounts of trust. While AI meets all of the requirements of the rational account of trust, it will be shown that this is not actually a type of trust at all, but is instead, a form of reliance. Ultimately, even complex machines such as AI should not be viewed as trustworthy as this undermines the value of interpersonal trust, anthropomorphises AI, and diverts responsibility from those developing and using them.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2020. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Science & Engineering Ethics
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N