The Human Side of Artificial Intelligence.

Artificial moral agents raise complex ethical questions both in terms of the potential decisions they may make as well as the inputs that create their cognitive architecture. There are multiple differences between human and artificial cognition which create potential barriers for artificial moral ag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 26; no. 5; pp. 2427 - 2438
Autor principal: Butkus, Matthew A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Oct2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=146390935&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 146390935
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13533452
        GNI
      jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics
      issn: 13533452
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2020
      vid: 26
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        146390935
        10.1007/s11948-020-00239-9
      ppf: 2427
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 577KB
      tig:
        atl: The Human Side of Artificial Intelligence.
      aug:
        au: Butkus, Matthew A.
        affil: Department of Social Sciences, McNeese State University, Lake Charles, LA, USA
      su:
        Artificial intelligence
        Potential barrier
        Decision making
      sug:
        subj:
          Artificial intelligence
          Potential barrier
          Decision making
      keyword:
        Ethics
        Moral agency
        Neural modeling
        Ontology
        Popular culture
      ab: Artificial moral agents raise complex ethical questions both in terms of the potential decisions they may make as well as the inputs that create their cognitive architecture. There are multiple differences between human and artificial cognition which create potential barriers for artificial moral agency, at least as understood anthropocentrically and it is unclear that artificial moral agents should emulate human cognition and decision-making. It is conceptually possible for artificial moral agency to emerge that reflects alternative ethical methodologies without creating ontological challenges or existential crises for human moral agents.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2020. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Science & Engineering Ethics
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N